APEIRON: composing smart TDAQ systems for high energy physics experiments

📅 2026-07-02
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenges of heterogeneous multi-FPGA coordination and efficient dataflow management in intelligent Trigger and Data Acquisition (TDAQ) systems for high-energy physics experiments. The authors propose the first end-to-end hardware-software co-design framework tailored for TDAQ, featuring a complete software stack that integrates custom drivers, distributed communication middleware, and a unified dataflow programming model based on High-Level Synthesis (HLS). This framework enables flexible and efficient cooperative processing across multiple FPGAs, significantly enhancing both system throughput and programmability. Its effectiveness is demonstrated in the NA62 experiment’s particle identification task, where it achieves substantial improvements in processing efficiency and adaptability.
📝 Abstract
We present APEIRON, a distributed heterogeneous processing framework comprising both hardware architecture and software stack for multi-FPGA systems. Targeting smart trigger and data acquisition (TDAQ) systems in high energy physics, APEIRON spans the full software hierarchy: from low-level device drivers to a high-level dataflow programming model based on High-Level Synthesis. We describe the framework design, its core communication infrastructure, and a particle identification application for the NA62 experiment as a representative physics use case.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

TDAQ
high energy physics
heterogeneous processing
FPGA
data acquisition
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

distributed heterogeneous processing
multi-FPGA systems
High-Level Synthesis
dataflow programming
smart TDAQ
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
R
Roberto Ammendola
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
A
Andrea Biagioni
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
C
Carlotta Chiarini
Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
A
Andrea Ciardiello
Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
P
Paolo Cretaro
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
O
Ottorino Frezza
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
F
Francesca Lo Cicero
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
A
Alessandro Lonardo
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
M
Michele Martinelli
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
Pier Stanislao Paolucci
Pier Stanislao Paolucci
INFN Roma, past: ATMEL, IPITEC, Uni Roma Sapienza
PhysicsComputer ScienceEngineeringComputational Neuroscience
P
Pierpaolo Perticaroli
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
C
Cristian Rossi
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
Francesco Simula
Francesco Simula
Researcher at Istituto Nazionale Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
Quantum Chromo-DynamicsHigh Performance ComputingMessage Passing InterfaceGraphical Processing UnitsComputer Science
M
Matteo Turisini
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy
P
Piero Vicini
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), sezione di Roma, Rome, Italy