Non-synchronism in Global Usage of Research Methods in Library and Information Science from 1990 to 2019

2026-07-02

AI Summary

This study investigates the divergent patterns and asynchronous evolution of research methodology adoption across countries in the field of Library and Information Science (LIS) from 1990 to 2019. By integrating manual annotation with deep learning models, the authors present the first large-scale cross-national classification of methodologies employed in 5,281 international journal articles from 81 countries. The findings reveal that national methodological practices exhibit distinct and statistically significant distributional patterns, yet these differences have gradually diminished over time at both national and international levels. This work offers novel methodological insights and empirical evidence for understanding country-specific trajectories in LIS development and fostering international scholarly collaboration.

Abstract

The global development of Library and Information Science (LIS) is influenced by various factors such as the economy, society, culture, discipline, tradition, and more. Consequently, the research methods of LIS vary greatly among countries. To better understand these differences, we conducted a study of 5,281 research papers from 81 countries published in internationally representative journals over the past thirty years. We manually annotated the research methods used in some articles through content analysis, and subsequently developed and trained a deep learning model for automatic classification of research methods. Using this method, we conducted a comparative analysis of the usage of research methods in different countries. Our findings reveal that there are differences in the research methods used across countries, with each country having its unique research profile and distribution of research methods. Even when investigating the same topic, research methods can differ between countries. Our study also uncovers that there are differences between the national and international distribution of research methods, these differences have decreased over the past 30 years. By highlighting the characteristics of discipline development in various countries from the perspective of research methods, our study can help guide discipline development at the national level. This study provides insights into the usage trends of research methods across different countries and highlights the unique characteristics of discipline development in each country. This information can be valuable in promoting collaboration and understanding between countries and in guiding discipline development at the national level.

Problem

• Library and Information Science
• research methods
• non-synchronism
• cross-national comparison
• methodological diversity

Innovation

• deep learning
• research methods classification
• cross-national comparison
• Library and Information Science
• content analysis