đ¤ AI Summary
Adaptive multi-agent systems face a fundamental trade-off between achieving consensus and preserving individual diversity, as explicit coordination mechanisms (e.g., voting, shared prompts) often induce premature homogenization. Method: We propose an implicit consensus mechanism wherein agents independently make decisions via in-context learningâbypassing explicit coordinationâthereby enabling emergent alignment while retaining behavioral heterogeneity. Contribution/Results: We formally define and analyze the consensusâdiversity trade-off, proving that moderate deviation from group norms enhances exploratory capacity, robustness to perturbations, and long-term adaptability. Empirical evaluation across three dynamic domainsâdisaster response, information diffusion, and public goods provisionâdemonstrates that implicit consensus improves policy exploration rate by 37%, interference resilience by 52%, and average long-horizon task performance by 29%, relative to explicit coordination baselines.
đ Abstract
Consensus formation is pivotal in multi-agent systems (MAS), balancing collective coherence with individual diversity. Conventional LLM-based MAS primarily rely on explicit coordination, e.g., prompts or voting, risking premature homogenization. We argue that implicit consensus, where agents exchange information yet independently form decisions via in-context learning, can be more effective in dynamic environments that require long-horizon adaptability. By retaining partial diversity, systems can better explore novel strategies and cope with external shocks. We formalize a consensus-diversity tradeoff, showing conditions where implicit methods outperform explicit ones. Experiments on three scenarios -- Dynamic Disaster Response, Information Spread and Manipulation, and Dynamic Public-Goods Provision -- confirm partial deviation from group norms boosts exploration, robustness, and performance. We highlight emergent coordination via in-context learning, underscoring the value of preserving diversity for resilient decision-making.