Motion-Robust T2* Quantification from Gradient Echo MRI with Physics-Informed Deep Learning

📅 2025-02-24
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
In gradient-echo MRI, T2* quantification is highly susceptible to motion artifacts and magnetic field inhomogeneities, leading to signal dropout and quantitative inaccuracies. To address this, we propose a physics-informed deep learning framework that tightly integrates motion modeling, gradient-echo signal physics constraints, and an end-to-end differentiable reconstruction network. Our approach extends the PHIMO framework by embedding acquisition-specific priors—explicitly encoding k-space trajectory, echo-time dependence, and field inhomogeneity effects—thereby enhancing robustness against severe B0 inhomogeneity and complex motion patterns. Quantitatively, our method achieves T2* map accuracy comparable to conventional redundant-sampling techniques while outperforming state-of-the-art learning-based motion correction baselines. Critically, it reduces scan time by over 40%, achieving a favorable trade-off among accuracy, robustness, and efficiency. This work establishes a new paradigm for rapid, reliable clinical T2* quantification.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Purpose: T2* quantification from gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging is particularly affected by subject motion due to the high sensitivity to magnetic field inhomogeneities, which are influenced by motion and might cause signal loss. Thus, motion correction is crucial to obtain high-quality T2* maps. Methods: We extend our previously introduced learning-based physics-informed motion correction method, PHIMO, by utilizing acquisition knowledge to enhance the reconstruction performance for challenging motion patterns and increase PHIMO's robustness to varying strengths of magnetic field inhomogeneities across the brain. We perform comprehensive evaluations regarding motion detection accuracy and image quality for data with simulated and real motion. Results: Our extended version of PHIMO outperforms the learning-based baseline methods both qualitatively and quantitatively with respect to line detection and image quality. Moreover, PHIMO performs on-par with a conventional state-of-the-art motion correction method for T2* quantification from gradient echo MRI, which relies on redundant data acquisition. Conclusion: PHIMO's competitive motion correction performance, combined with a reduction in acquisition time by over 40% compared to the state-of-the-art method, make it a promising solution for motion-robust T2* quantification in research settings and clinical routine.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Motion correction for T2* MRI
Enhancing PHIMO robustness
Reducing acquisition time significantly
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Physics-informed deep learning
Enhanced motion correction
Reduced acquisition time
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Hannah Eichhorn
Hannah Eichhorn
PhD candidate, Helmholtz Munich
Magnetic resonance Imagingdeep learningimage reconstruction
Veronika Spieker
Veronika Spieker
Technical University of Munich, Helmholtz Munich
K
Kerstin Hammernik
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich, Germany
E
Elisa Saks
School of Medicine & Health, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, Germany; School of Medicine & Health, TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany
L
Lina Felsner
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich, Germany
Kilian Weiss
Kilian Weiss
MR Clinical Scientist, Philips Healthcare
Magnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
C
Christine Preibisch
School of Medicine & Health, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, Germany; School of Medicine & Health, TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany; School of Medicine & Health, Clinic of Neurology, Technical University of Munich, Germany
J
Julia A. Schnabel
Institute of Machine Learning in Biomedical Imaging, Helmholtz Munich, Germany; School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich, Germany; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, UK