๐ค AI Summary
Current large-scale neuroscience data remain highly fragmented, lacking a unified framework to elucidate the closed-loop coupling mechanisms among brain, body, and environment in behavior generation. This work proposes an integrative neuro-cybernetic modeling paradigm that conceptualizes the brain as a controller pursuing latent goals. By synthesizing multi-scale neural recordings, behavioral measurements, perturbations, and connectomic anatomical constraints, it constructs interpretable nonlinear state-space models. The approach incorporates meta-dynamics extensions, hybrid open- and closed-loop training, and knowledge distillation strategies to identify shared dynamical structures across experiments and individuals, disentangle individual variability, infer behavioral objectives, and achieve few-shot generalization. This framework establishes a mechanistic and generalizable computational foundation for uncovering the organizing principles of neural-behavioral systems.
๐ Abstract
Large-scale neuroscience is generating rich datasets across animals, brain areas and behavioral contexts, yet our modeling efforts remains fragmented across isolated experiments. We argue that understanding behavior requires integrative neurocybernetic models: understandable dynamical models that capture the closed-loop coupling of brain, body and environment, treat the brain as a controller pursuing latent objectives, represent structured variation across scales, and scale to heterogeneous datasets. Such models shift the goal from predicting neural recordings in isolation to inferring the organizing principles that govern neural and behavioral dynamics. We outline a practical route toward this goal by combining nonlinear state-space models and meta-dynamical extensions with scalable inference, knowledge distillation, mixed open- and closed-loop training, and connectomics-informed architectures. By pooling complementary constraints from recordings, behavior, perturbations and anatomy, integrative neurocybernetic models can provide statistical amplification, few-shot generalization, and mechanistic insight into shared dynamical structure, individual variation, and the control objectives that govern behavior. This agenda offers a model-centric path from fragmented data to a mechanistic science of how brains produce behavior.