🤖 AI Summary
This study evaluates the problem-solving capabilities of large language models on university-level data structures examination questions. To this end, the authors construct the first closed-book, multiple-choice benchmark dataset derived from the Data Structures course at Tel Aviv University and systematically assess several prominent models—including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, Mathstral 7B, and LLaMA 3 8B—on this benchmark. The findings illuminate both the current performance and inherent limitations of these models in tackling core computer science problems, thereby addressing a critical gap in domain-specific evaluation benchmarks for foundational computing curricula. Moreover, the work provides empirical evidence supporting the potential integration of large language models into higher education contexts.
📝 Abstract
We present a comprehensive evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on Computer Science (CS) Data Structure examination questions. Our work introduces a new benchmark dataset comprising exam questions from Tel Aviv University (TAU), curated to assess LLMs' abilities in handling closed and multiple-choice questions. We evaluated the performance of OpenAI's GPT 4o and Anthropic's Claude 3.5, popular LLMs, alongside two smaller LLMs, Mathstral 7B and LLaMA 3 8B, across the TAU exams benchmark. Our findings provide insight into the current capabilities of LLMs in CS education.