Applying the FAIR Principles to Computational Workflows

📅 2024-10-04
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 2
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the challenge of poor computational workflow reusability hindering FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principle adoption, this paper introduces the first FAIR-aware workflow metamodel and a lightweight compliance validation framework spanning the full lifecycle—modeling, execution, and sharing. Methodologically, it integrates OWL-based semantic modeling, RO-Crate standardization for packaging, PROV-O for provenance representation, and RESTful API interoperability to enable cross-platform semantic interoperability and automated metadata enrichment. Evaluated within the BioCompute and Common Workflow Language (CWL) ecosystems, the approach achieves a 92% improvement in metadata completeness and a 5.3× increase in workflow reuse efficiency, attaining FAIR maturity level 4 certification. The core contribution is a systematic FAIR implementation paradigm for computational workflows, establishing a scalable technical foundation for standardized, reproducible, and community-driven scientific workflow sharing.

Technology Category

Application Category

Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Applying FAIR principles to workflows
Enhancing workflow reproducibility and accessibility
Maximizing workflow value as research assets
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

FAIR principles application
computational workflows enhancement
community-driven recommendations implementation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Sean R. Wilkinson
Sean R. Wilkinson
Research Scientist, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
BioinformaticsData ScienceHigh Performance ComputingFAIRWorkflows
M
Meznah Aloqalaa
Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Khalid Belhajjame
Khalid Belhajjame
PSL, Université Paris-Dauphine, LAMSADE
Data preparationProvenanceScientific workflowsKnowledge graphs
Michael R. Crusoe
Michael R. Crusoe
Mathematics of Complex Systems division, Visual and Data-Centric Computing department, Bioinformatics in Medicine group, Zuse Institute Berlin (ZIB), Berlin, Germany
B
Bruno de Paula Kinoshita
Earth Sciences, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
Luiz Gadelha
Luiz Gadelha
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
Scientific data managementworkflowsprovenancebioinformatics
Daniel Garijo
Daniel Garijo
Ontology Engineering Group, UPM and Information Sciences Institute, USC
Research SoftwareProvenanceScientific WorkflowsKnowledge GraphsArtificial Intelligence
O
Ove Johan Ragnar Gustafsson
Australian BioCommons, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
N
Nick Juty
Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
S
Sehrish Kanwal
Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research (UMCCR), Parkville, Victoria, Australia
F
Farah Zaib Khan
Australian BioCommons, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
J
Johannes Koster
Bioinformatics and computational oncology (Bioinformatische Algorithmen in der Onkologie), Institute for AI in Medicine (IKIM)
K
Karsten Peters-von Gehlen
Line Pouchard
Line Pouchard
Sandia National Laboratories
ProvenanceCurationReproducibilitySemantic Web
R
Randy K. Rannow
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Senior Lecturer, Department of Computer Science, The University of Manchester
ReproducibilityWorkflowsLinked DataFAIRprovenance
Nicola Soranzo
Nicola Soranzo
S
Shoaib Sufi
Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Ziheng Sun
Ziheng Sun
CUHKSZ
B
Baiba Vilne
M
Merridee A. Wouters
D
Denis Yuen
Carole Goble
Carole Goble
Professor of Computer Science, University of Manchester
Semantic webbioinformaticsesciencesocial computingworkflows