The Gulf of Interpretation: From Chart to Message and Back Again

📅 2023-10-09
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study identifies a systematic “interpretation gap” between designers’ communicative intent and audiences’ comprehension in data visualization. Employing a mixed-methods approach—including participatory workshops with data journalists, in-depth interviews across diverse audience groups (students, job seekers, designers, older adults), qualitative coding, and comparative analysis of intended versus perceived information—we empirically uncover three primary causes: ambiguous terminology, cognitive overload, and mismatches between visual conventions and audience expectations. From this, we derive six recurrent patterns of misinterpretation. Building on these findings, we formulate audience-cognition–informed chart design principles grounded in empirical evidence, offering actionable guidelines to enhance visualization interpretability. This work bridges a critical gap in human-centered visualization research from a communication perspective, advancing both theoretical understanding and practical design practice.
📝 Abstract
Charts are used to communicate data visually, but often, we do not know whether a chart's intended message aligns with the message readers perceive. In this mixed-methods study, we investigate how data journalists encode data and how members of a broad audience engage with, experience, and understand these visualizations. We conducted workshops and interviews with school and university students, job seekers, designers, and senior citizens to collect perceived messages and feedback on eight real-world charts. We analyzed these messages and compared them to the intended message. Our results help to understand the gulf that can exist between messages (that producers encode) and viewer interpretations. In particular, we find that consumers are often overwhelmed with the amount of data provided and are easily confused with terms that are not well known. Chart producers tend to follow strong conventions on how to visually encode particular information that might not always benefit consumers.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Misalignment between chart messages and reader perceptions
Challenges in audience engagement with data visualizations
Overwhelming data and confusing terminology in charts
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Mixed-methods study on chart interpretation
Workshops and interviews for message analysis
Comparison of intended and perceived messages
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.