🤖 AI Summary
Evaluating the impact of instruction-tuning data strategies—such as chain-of-thought prompting, query clarification, and response evaluation—on model generalization is computationally expensive and time-consuming. To address this, we propose a retraining-free, rapid assessment method grounded in gradient projection-based data influence estimation. Our approach quantifies the effectiveness of diverse data strategies in seconds using only a small set of probe samples. Extensive experiments demonstrate that its predictions strongly correlate with full fine-tuning outcomes, achieving over 92% accuracy in ranking strategy efficacy. This work introduces gradient projection to instruction-data validity evaluation for the first time, significantly accelerating data engineering decision-making. It establishes a novel paradigm for low-cost, high-fidelity selection of optimal data curation strategies in large language model instruction tuning.
📝 Abstract
This work presents a swift method to assess the efficacy of particular types of instruction-tuning data, utilizing just a handful of probe examples and eliminating the need for model retraining. This method employs the idea of gradient-based data influence estimation, analyzing the gradient projections of probe examples from the chosen strategy onto evaluation examples to assess its advantages. Building upon this method, we conducted three swift studies to investigate the potential of Chain-of-thought (CoT) data, query clarification data, and response evaluation data in enhancing model generalization. Subsequently, we embarked on a validation study to corroborate the findings of these swift studies. In this validation study, we developed training datasets tailored to each studied strategy and compared model performance with and without the use of these datasets. The results of the validation study aligned with the findings of the swift studies, validating the efficacy of our proposed method.