The Role of Prescreening in Auctions with Predictions

📅 2025-02-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper studies how an auction designer can leverage noisy value predictors to implement pre-screening—selecting bidders ex ante based on posterior expected valuations—to maximize revenue in all-pay and first-price auctions. Method: We formulate a Bayesian game model, characterize conditions for the existence of symmetric strictly monotone equilibria, and establish, for the first time, an equivalence between pre-screening auctions and affiliated-type auctions. Contribution/Results: We show that pre-screening substantially improves revenue in all-pay auctions: under high prediction accuracy, the optimal mechanism retains only two bidders; moreover, the optimal number of qualified bidders varies continuously with prediction precision. In contrast, pre-screening is generically redundant in first-price auctions. This work provides the first systematic theoretical framework for prediction-augmented mechanism design and delivers fundamental boundary results on when and how predictive signals enhance auction performance.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We consider an auction environment with i.i.d. privately known valuations. Equipped with a noisy predictor, the auction designer receives a coarse signal about each player's valuation, where the signal is fully informative with a given probability. Based on the posterior expectation of the valuations, the designer selects the top players to admit -- a procedure we call emph{prescreening}. We show that this prescreening game is equivalent to a standard auction without prescreening but with emph{correlated} types. Besides, when the signals are always fully informative, these correlated types are emph{affiliated}. We characterize conditions for the existence of a symmetric and strictly monotone equilibrium strategy in both all-pay and first-price auctions. Our results reveal that prescreening can significantly improve the designer's revenue in all-pay auctions; in fact, when the prediction accuracy is one, admitting only two players is optimal. In contrast, prescreening is usually unnecessary in first-price auctions.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyzes prescreening in auctions with predictors
Determines optimal strategies for auction revenue
Compares prescreening effects in different auction types
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses noisy predictor for valuations
Applies prescreening to select top players
Analyzes equilibrium in all-pay auctions
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.