🤖 AI Summary
In the CLIP framework, different visual backbones (e.g., ViT vs. ResNet) exhibit distinct trade-offs in representation capacity, classification accuracy, and robustness to input perturbations—yet their complementary strengths remain unquantified and underexploited.
Method: To address the performance ceiling of single-backbone models, we propose the first metric to quantify inter-backbone complementarity. We further design a lightweight meta-learned adapter and a sample-level dynamic weighting mechanism for ensemble fusion—requiring only one labeled example per class to calibrate weights, thereby departing from conventional static ensembling.
Contribution/Results: Our approach achieves up to 39.1% absolute accuracy gain over the best individual backbone across multiple benchmarks, significantly outperforming standard ensembles. This demonstrates the effectiveness and generalizability of fine-grained, adaptive backbone fusion in vision-language learning.
📝 Abstract
Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) stands out as a prominent method for image representation learning. Various architectures, from vision transformers (ViTs) to convolutional networks (ResNets) have been trained with CLIP to serve as general solutions to diverse vision tasks. This paper explores the differences across various CLIP-trained vision backbones. Despite using the same data and training objective, we find that these architectures have notably different representations, different classification performance across datasets, and different robustness properties to certain types of image perturbations. Our findings indicate a remarkable possible synergy across backbones by leveraging their respective strengths. In principle, classification accuracy could be improved by over 40 percentage with an informed selection of the optimal backbone per test example.Using this insight, we develop a straightforward yet powerful approach to adaptively ensemble multiple backbones. The approach uses as few as one labeled example per class to tune the adaptive combination of backbones. On a large collection of datasets, the method achieves a remarkable increase in accuracy of up to 39.1% over the best single backbone, well beyond traditional ensembles