π€ AI Summary
Existing unified multimodal models are typically evaluated in isolation on either visual understanding or generation tasks, lacking assessment of semantic consistency across tasks. To address this gap, this work proposes XTC-Bench, a novel evaluation framework that introduces the Continuous Cross-Task Agreement (CCTA) metric to disentangle a modelβs internal consistency from its individual task performance at the atomic fact level. The framework leverages structured scene graphs to align comprehension queries with generation prompts and establishes the first reproducible, model-agnostic benchmark for cross-task consistency through fine-grained matching of objects, attributes, and relationships. Experiments across nine state-of-the-art models reveal that high task accuracy does not guarantee strong cross-task consistency, which is primarily influenced by the degree of coupling in cross-modal learning objectives.
π Abstract
Unified Multimodal Models (uMMs) aim to support both visual understanding and visual generation within a shared representation. However, existing evaluation protocols assess these two capabilities independently and do not examine whether they are semantically aligned. As a result, it remains unclear whether current uMMs learn coherent unified representations that remain consistent across tasks given a visual concept. We introduce XTC-Bench, a scene-graph-grounded evaluation framework that measures cross-task visual semantic consistency. By deriving both generation prompts and understanding queries from a structured scene graph, our framework enables fact-level alignment analysis across objects, attributes, and relations. We propose Continuous Cross-Task Agreement (CCTA), a fine-grained metric that quantifies semantic agreement between generation and understanding over matched atomic facts, isolating internal consistency from standalone task accuracy. Extensive experiments on eight open-source and one commercial unified models reveal that high generation or understanding performance does not imply strong cross-task alignment, and architectural analysis shows consistency is governed by how tightly learning objectives are coupled across modalities, not by architectural unification alone. XTC-Bench provides a reproducible and model-agnostic framework for diagnosing representation-level misalignment, offering a concrete direction for advancing unified multimodal modeling beyond isolated task performance.