🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the planning existence problem in epistemic reasoning: given a modal-logic goal, an initial epistemic state, and a set of epistemic actions, does there exist a sequence of actions that achieves the goal? Focusing on a highly restricted setting where epistemic actions have preconditions of modal depth at most one and no postconditions, the analysis employs modal logic, Kripke semantics, and formal reduction techniques. The work establishes, for the first time, that even under these strong syntactic and semantic constraints, the planning existence problem remains undecidable. This result fills a critical gap in the decidability landscape of epistemic planning and delineates new theoretical boundaries for automated planning and cognitive reasoning systems.
📝 Abstract
The plan existence problem asks, given a goal in the form of a formula in modal logic, an initial epistemic state (a pointed Kripke model), and a set of epistemic actions, whether there exists a sequence of actions that can be applied to reach the goal. We prove that even in the case where the preconditions of the epistemic actions have modal depth at most 1, and there are no postconditions, the plan existence problem is undecidable. The (un)decidability of this problem was previously unknown.