🤖 AI Summary
Existing models for numerical reasoning over specialized tables often rely on superficial associations between table headers and operations, resulting in poor cross-domain generalization. This work proposes the TaNOS framework, which decouples domain-specific semantics from numerical operation structures through header anonymization, operation sketch guidance, and program-prioritized self-supervised pretraining. TaNOS is the first approach to jointly integrate operation sketches, header-agnostic representations, and correctness-guaranteed self-supervision. Remarkably, it achieves an execution accuracy of 80.13% using only 10% of the FinQA training data—surpassing fully supervised fine-tuned baselines (73.97%) and outperforming closed-source models such as GPT-5 and Gemini-2.5-Pro—while reducing the cross-domain performance gap to within two percentage points.
📝 Abstract
Numerical reasoning over expert-domain tables often exhibits high in-domain accuracy but limited robustness to domain shift. Models trained with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on specific datasets tend to rely on header-operation shortcuts rather than structural reasoning. We introduce TaNOS, a continual pre-training framework comprising three components: (i) header anonymization to reduce lexical memorization, (ii) operation sketches that provide minimal structural cues, and (iii) self-supervised pretraining that constructs correctness-guaranteed program-question pairs from given tables in a program-first manner. By decoupling domain semantics and numerical operation structure, TaNOS improves the transferability of numerical reasoning. Applied to an 8B instruction-tuned model, TaNOS achieves 80.13% execution accuracy on FinQA with only 10% train data, outperforming SFT baseline (73.97%) with full train data and proprietary models such as GPT-5, Gemini-2.5-Pro. Furthermore, in the domain-shift experiments, TaNOS displays nearly-negligible cross-domain gap (<2pp) when standard SFT shows over 10pp gap. These results suggest that structural guidance with operation sketches, header-agnostic representations, and correctness-guaranteed self-supervision can improve the robustness of numerical reasoning across diverse expert-domain tables.