Random Access Codes: Explicit Constructions, Optimality, and Classical-Quantum Gaps

๐Ÿ“… 2026-04-23
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF

career value

205K/year
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This work addresses the explicit optimal construction of classical random access codes (RACs) for arbitrary parameters $(L,k)$, with the goal of maximizing both average and worst-case decoding success probabilities, while also examining the performance gap relative to quantum RACs. By reformulating the problem as selecting $2^k$ points in $\{0,1\}^L$ or $[0,1]^L$ to minimize inter-class distances, the authors develop a general framework for explicit constructions. Their main contributions include the first explicit optimal construction for classical RACs in the general $(L,k)$ setting, a rigorous proof that the $(L,L-1)$ case achieves the known theoretical upper boundโ€”and consequently that the corresponding quantum RAC attains the conjectured upper boundโ€”and numerical evidence showing that classical and quantum RACs exhibit comparable performance on average, yet display a significant gap in worst-case scenarios.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
A random access code (RAC) encodes an $L$-bit string into a $k$-bit $(L>k)$ message from which any designated source bit can be recovered with high probability. Its quantum counterpart, a quantum random access code (QRAC), replaces the $k$-bit message with $k$ qubits. While upper bounds on the decoding success probability have long been studied in both classical and quantum settings, explicit constructions of optimal codes are known only in special cases, even for classical RACs. In this paper, we develop a constructive framework for classical $(L,k)$-RACs under both average- and worst-case criteria. We show that optimal code design reduces to selecting $2^k$ points in $\{0,1\}^L$ and $[0,1]^L$ for the average- and worst-case criteria, respectively, so as to minimize a distance-like objective. This characterization yields explicit constructions for general $(L,k)$. For $k=L-1$, we further obtain closed-form optimal encoders and decoders for both criteria, and show that the resulting classical $(L,L-1)$-RACs attain the corresponding proved upper bounds. We also show that these optimal classical codes induce $(L,L-1)$-QRACs that attain a conjectured upper bound on the decoding success probability. Numerical optimization suggests little difference between RACs and QRACs in the average-case setting, but a potentially large classical-quantum gap in the worst-case nonasymptotic regime.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Random Access Codes
Quantum Random Access Codes
Optimal Constructions
Decoding Success Probability
Classical-Quantum Gap
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Random Access Codes
Explicit Construction
Classical-Quantum Gap
Optimality
Worst-case Performance
Ruho Kondo
Ruho Kondo
Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc.
Crystal PlasticityPhase-fieldMachine LearningQuantum Computing
Yuki Sato
Yuki Sato
Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc.
Optimum DesignTopology OptimizationComputational MechanicsQuantum Algorithm
H
Hiroshi Yano
Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc., 1-4-14 Koraku, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-0004, Japan, and also with the Quantum Computing Center, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8522, Japan
Yota Maeda
Yota Maeda
TU Darmstadt
Arithmetic GeometryAlgebraic GeometryQuantum Information TheoryMachine Learning
K
Kosuke Ito
Advanced Material Engineering Division, Toyota Motor Corporation, 1200 Mishuku, Susono, Shizuoka 410-1193, Japan, and also with the Quantum Computing Center, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8522, Japan
Naoki Yamamoto
Naoki Yamamoto
Keio University
Theoretical Physics