🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the instability and inferential biases that arise when estimating income distributions separately for each year, particularly in subpopulations with small sample sizes, which can lead to inaccurate welfare measures and erroneous conclusions about Lorenz and stochastic dominance. To overcome these limitations, the paper proposes a dynamic Bayesian model that incorporates a random-walk parameter evolution mechanism with shrinkage priors, enabling information sharing across adjacent years. This approach yields coherent inference on time-varying income distributions and their derived inequality and poverty indicators. Simulation studies and empirical analyses demonstrate that the method substantially improves estimation accuracy and stability in small samples, effectively dampens spurious fluctuations, and revises prior findings regarding stochastic dominance relationships between the income distributions of Indigenous Australians and residents of the Australian Capital Territory.
📝 Abstract
Survey data are widely used to study how income inequality, poverty, and welfare evolve over time. A common practice is to estimate the income distribution separately for each year, treating annual observations as independent cross-sections. For population subgroups with relatively small sample sizes, however, this approach can produce unstable parameter estimates, imprecise inference for inequality and poverty measures, and potentially misleading posterior probabilities of Lorenz and stochastic dominance. This paper develops flexible Bayesian models for time-varying income distributions that borrow strength across adjacent years by allowing the parameters of income distributions to evolve dynamically. We consider a random walk specification and an extended model with shrinkage priors. The proposed framework yields coherent inference for the full income distributions over time, as well as for associated inequality measures, poverty indices, and dominance probabilities. Simulation studies show that, relative to independent year-by-year models, the proposed approach produces substantially more precise and stable inference, while avoiding spurious variation in welfare comparisons. An application to the Aboriginal and residents of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) population subgroups in the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey shows that the dynamic models deliver improved inference for income distributions and related welfare measures, and can change conclusions about distributional dominance over time.