Planetary Exploration 3.0: A Roadmap for Software-Defined, Radically Adaptive Space Systems

📅 2026-04-21
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

195K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Traditional incremental planetary exploration paradigms are ill-suited for outer solar system missions spanning more than a decade, as they lack the adaptability to evolve through repeated iterations in response to unknown environments. This work proposes a new paradigm—Planetary Exploration 3.0 (PE 3.0)—that integrates software-defined space systems, embodied artificial intelligence, and modular architecture to enable spacecraft to autonomously reconfigure their functionalities in real time based on in situ data and conduct hypothesis-driven scientific investigations. Key enabling technologies include reconfigurable hardware, multifunctional modular design, and onboard autonomous decision-making with navigation and control. The study establishes a comprehensive PE 3.0 systems engineering framework and demonstrates its feasibility and superiority through three mission concepts: an intelligent Neptune–Triton flyby, an icy ocean world explorer, and an Oort Cloud reconnaissance mission.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The surface and subsurface of worlds beyond Mars remain largely unexplored. Yet these worlds hold keys to fundamental questions in planetary science - from potentially habitable subsurface oceans on icy moons to ancient records preserved in Kuiper Belt objects. NASA's success in Mars exploration was achieved through incrementalism: 22 progressively sophisticated missions over decades. This paradigm, which we call Planetary Exploration 2.0 (PE 2.0), is untenable for the outer Solar System, where cruise times of a decade or more make iterative missions infeasible. We propose Planetary Exploration 3.0 (PE 3.0): a paradigm in which unvisited worlds are explored by a single or a few missions with radically adaptive space systems. A PE 3.0 mission conducts both initial exploratory science and follow-on hypothesis-driven science based on its own in situ data returns, evolving spacecraft capabilities to work resiliently in previously unseen environments. The key enabler of PE 3.0 is software-defined space systems (SDSSs) - systems that can adapt their functions at all levels through software updates. This paper presents findings from a Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) workshop on PE 3.0, covering: (1) PE 3.0 systems engineering including science definition, architecture, design methods, and verification & validation; (2) software-defined space system technologies including reconfigurable hardware, multi-functionality, and modularity; (3) onboard intelligence including autonomous science, navigation, controls, and embodied AI; and (4) three PE 3.0 mission concepts: a Neptune/Triton smart flyby, an ocean world explorer, and an Oort cloud reconnaissance mission.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Planetary Exploration
Outer Solar System
Adaptive Space Systems
Software-Defined Systems
Single-Mission Exploration
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Software-Defined Space Systems
Radically Adaptive Spacecraft
Autonomous Science
Reconfigurable Hardware
Embodied AI
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Masahiro Ono
Masahiro Ono
Imperial College London
ImmunologyT cellsCancer ImmunotherapyCytometrySingle Cell Genomics
Daniel Selva
Daniel Selva
Texas A&M University
space systemsintelligent systemssystems engineeringsystem designearth observation
M
Morgan L. Cable
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA; Planetary Science Institute, AZ 85719, USA; Te Herenga Waka – Victoria University of Wellington, 6011, New Zealand
M
Marie Ethvignot
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA; Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland
M
Margaret Hansen
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
Andreas M. Hein
Andreas M. Hein
SnT, University of Luxembourg
model-based systems engineeringspace systemssustainabilitysystems engineeringsystem architectures
E
Elena-Sorina Lupu
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA; Openmind Research Institute, Edmonton, Canada; California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Zachary Manchester
Zachary Manchester
Carnegie Mellon University
RoboticsControlOptimizationSpace Exploration
D
David Murrow
Space Connections, LLC, Highlands Ranch, CO 80126, USA
C
Chad Pozarycki
Deleon Technologies, Inc., Atlanta, GA 30309, USA
Pascal Spino
Pascal Spino
Graduate Student at MIT
robot swarmsunderwater robotsspace robots
A
Amanda Stockton
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30330, USA
M
Mathieu Choukroun
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Soon-Jo Chung
Soon-Jo Chung
Bren Professor of Control and Dynamical Systems at Caltech; JPL Senior Research Scientist
AutonomyAerial RoboticsSpace SystemsSpacecraft Formation FlyingNonlinear Control
J
John Day
Blue Origin, Kent, WA, USA
A
Alexander Demagall
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840, USA
A
Anthony Freeman
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
C
Chloe Gentgen
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
M
Michel D. Ingham
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
C
Charity M. Phillips-Lander
Space Science Division, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA
R
Richard Rieber
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
A
Alejandro Salado
The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Maria Sakovsky
Maria Sakovsky
Assistant Professor, Stanford University
Active StructuresThin-ply CompositesShape Morphing Antennas
L
Lori R. Shiraishi
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Yisong Yue
Yisong Yue
California Institute of Technology; Asari AI; Latitude AI
Machine LearningArtificial Intelligence