Bridging Predictions and Interventions: An Integrated Framework for Automated Decision-Systems

📅 2026-06-24
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses a critical limitation in current automated decision-making systems, which prioritize predictive accuracy while neglecting their systemic impact on organizational workflows and decision processes, thereby compromising downstream societal outcomes. To overcome this “prediction-first” paradigm, the study proposes an intervention-oriented integrative framework that systematically incorporates organizational dynamics and intervention mechanisms into the design and evaluation of automated decision systems. By synthesizing insights from social science theory and decision systems analysis, the research establishes an interdisciplinary pathway tailored to real-world deployment contexts. This approach offers a novel paradigm for understanding and optimizing the societal consequences of automated decision-making in high-stakes domains such as criminal justice, medical triage, and educational support.
📝 Abstract
Automated decision systems (ADS) leverage predictions about individual future outcomes to inform consequential decision-making in organizational settings. Across various settings - including criminal pretrial release, clinical triage, student support, and more - it is often assumed that improved predictive accuracy is the priority consideration in determining better downstream outcomes upon the deployment of ADS. In practice, real-world case studies reveal that this is far from the case: introducing individual predictions into decision-making modifies organizational workflows, assessment, and decision-making processes in ways that require a complete re-consideration of our approach to the design, evaluation, and deployment of ADS. As a result, this Perspective develops an integrated framework for studying ADS in social systems, shifting current priorities from a purely prediction-based paradigm towards an intervention-oriented view that accounts for real-world conditions. Our aim is to improve our understanding of ADS and more meaningfully anticipate its downstream societal and organizational consequences.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

automated decision systems
predictive accuracy
organizational workflows
intervention-oriented design
societal consequences
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

automated decision systems
intervention-oriented framework
predictive accuracy
organizational workflows
societal impact
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Inioluwa Deborah Raji
Inioluwa Deborah Raji
UC Berkeley
machine learningevaluationauditingalgorithmssociety
Lydia T. Liu
Lydia T. Liu
Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Princeton University
Machine LearningStatisticsDecision MakingAlgorithmic Fairness
Angela Zhou
Angela Zhou
Assistant Professor at University of Southern California, Data Sciences and Operations and CompSci
operations research/operations managementmachine learningcausal inferencealgorithmic fairness
Luke Guerdan
Luke Guerdan
Carnegie Mellon University
MeasurementEvaluation ScienceMachine LearningResponsible AIHuman-Computer Interaction
Jessica Hullman
Jessica Hullman
Ginni Rometty Professor of Computer Science, Northwestern University
uncertainty quantificationAI for decision-makingmetasciencevisualization
Daniel Malinsky
Daniel Malinsky
Assistant Professor of Biostatistics at Columbia University
Causal InferenceGraphical ModelsMachine LearningPhilosophy of ScienceFoundations of
Bryan Wilder
Bryan Wilder
Assistant Professor of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University
Artificial intelligenceoptimizationmachine learningsocial networks
S
Simone Zhang
H
Hammaad Adam
Amanda Coston
Amanda Coston
Microsoft
algorithmic fairnessmachine learningcausal inference
Ben Laufer
Ben Laufer
Cornell Tech
E
Ezinne Nwankwo
M
Michael Zanger-Tishler
Eli Ben-Michael
Eli Ben-Michael
Assistant Professor, Carnegie Mellon University
causal inferenceapplied statisticsquantitative social science
Avi Feller
Avi Feller
UC Berkeley
T
Talia Gillis
Shion Guha
Shion Guha
University of Toronto
Human-Centered Data SciencePublic Interest TechnologyResponsible AIAI Policy
D
Daniel Ho
L
Lily Hu
Kosuke Imai
Kosuke Imai
Professor of Government and of Statistics, Harvard University
applied statisticscausal inferencecomputational social sciencequantitative social sciencepolitical methodology
Sayash Kapoor
Sayash Kapoor
CS PhD, Princeton University
ReproducibilityAI agentsSocietal impacts
Joshua Loftus
Joshua Loftus
London School of Economics
StatisticsStatistical MethodologyMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
Razieh Nabi
Razieh Nabi
Rollins Assistant Professor of Biostatistics, Emory University
Causal InferenceMissing DataAlgorithmic FairnessGraphical ModelsSemiparametric Statistics
Juan Carlos Perdomo
Juan Carlos Perdomo
Postdoc, MIT
machine learningoptimization
M
Matthew Salganik