🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of evaluation mechanisms for precisely localizing multi-page handwritten solutions and their reasoning steps in existing automated grading approaches. We propose the first two-level region localization benchmark tailored for multi-page handwritten responses, which requires models to simultaneously identify the full answer region across a sequence of pages and its constituent, ordered step subregions, accompanied by a page-aware evaluation protocol. To support this benchmark, we construct a large-scale, manually annotated dataset featuring hierarchical annotations at both the problem and step levels—the first of its kind—and introduce a dual-metric evaluation framework based on Full Answer (FA) and Fine-grained Step (FSm) scores. Experiments reveal that zero-shot models exhibit limited performance (FA/FSm ≤ 55.22%/48.22%), whereas a fine-tuned GLM-4.6V 9B model achieves substantial gains (74.97%/72.26%), highlighting a critical capability gap in current models for fine-grained step localization.
📝 Abstract
Automated homework assessment depends not only on recognizing student answers, but also on accurately locating where each answer and each intermediate reasoning step appears in noisy, multi-page handwritten work. This paper addresses the missing evaluation setting of page-aware, two-level answer-region grounding: given a sequence of homework page images, a model must localize complete answer regions and their ordered step-level subregions. We introduce HG-Bench, a benchmark of 500 human-annotated K-12 homework samples curated from a 1,489,278-image source pool, with question-level and step-level boxes linked by a hierarchical containment constraint. HG-Bench is paired with a page-aware evaluation protocol that separately measures complete-answer localization (FA) and step-level decomposition (FSm), revealing whether models truly ground the spatial structure of student reasoning rather than merely parse visible text. Across frontier closed-source APIs and competitive open-weight VLMs, no zero-shot system exceeds 55.22% on FA or 48.22% on FSm, while a GLM-4.6V 9B reference model fine-tuned on ~10k in-domain examples reaches 74.97/72.26. These results identify step-level handwritten grounding as a concrete capability gap and provide a reproducible benchmark, evaluation protocol, and trained reference point for future work on automated homework assessment.