🤖 AI Summary
Existing state abstraction methods lack a general principle for rigorously preserving behavioral structure. This work proposes a unified framework that defines behavioral semantics in reinforcement learning in a compositional manner, grounded in local one-step descriptions of system dynamics, and establishes a theory for safe transfer of behavioral structure between abstract and concrete systems. For the first time, the framework enables a compositional formalization of behavioral semantics, supporting the derivation of quantitative metrics with correctness guarantees from logical semantics. It thus lays a principled foundation for behavioral reasoning under state abstraction and provides reusable definitions and provably faithful transfer mechanisms applicable to a broad class of behavioral structures.
📝 Abstract
State abstraction plays a key role in scaling reinforcement learning to complex but structured systems. In studying such systems, a wide range of behavioral structures have been studied in reinforcement learning, including value functions, invariants, bisimulation relations, and behavioral metrics. However, a general principle for determining what structures are provably preserved under state abstraction is still lacking. In this paper, we present a unified framework for defining and analyzing behavioral structures in reinforcement learning. Our framework provides a compositional way to specify behavioral semantics based on local, one-step descriptions of system dynamics. Using this framework, we establish results showing how behavioral structures can be safely transferred between abstract and concrete systems. We further show how to construct quantitative metrics from logical behavioral semantics with soundness guarantees. Together, these results provide a principled foundation for reasoning about behaviors under state abstraction in reinforcement learning and offer reusable definition and proof principles for a broad class of behavioral structures in reinforcement learning.