🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the high cost of functional genomics experiments by proposing a novel method to predict transcriptional responses of genes not perturbed during training. The approach aggregates single-cell perturbation data into perturbation-level expression shifts and constructs a low-rank response basis from observed perturbations. It uniquely integrates multiple biological priors—including STRING protein–protein interactions, Gene Ontology annotations, network topology, and control expression statistics—into a graph convolutional network to predict coordinates of unseen genes within this basis. By combining low-rank matrix factorization with residualized expression modeling, the method achieves a cosine similarity of 0.592 on the K562 Perturb-seq benchmark, significantly outperforming existing approaches such as GEARS and demonstrating consistent superiority across multiple datasets and evaluation metrics.
📝 Abstract
Predicting transcriptional responses to genetic perturbations could reduce the experimental burden of functional genomics, but extrapolation to genes that were never perturbed during training remains difficult. We present Stable-Shift, a structured method for estimating unseen-gene responses. Stable-Shift aggregates single-cell measurements into perturbation-level expression shifts, fits a low-rank response basis using training perturbations only, and predicts an unseen gene's coordinates in that basis from biological context. The context combines STRING interactions, network structure, control-cell expression statistics, and Gene Ontology annotations; the evaluated implementation uses graph convolution to integrate these inputs. On the supplied K562 Perturb-seq benchmark, Stable-Shift obtained 0.592 cosine similarity, compared with 0.569 for GEARS, together with higher Spearman correlation and top-gene precision among the evaluated methods. Its mean cosine similarity over five unseen-gene splits was 0.589 +/- 0.008. The same ordering was observed in the supplied graph-aware, residualized, gene-space, and Norman-dataset comparisons. These results support further study of biologically structured latent-response prediction, while the lower gene-space accuracy and sensitivity to sparse graph neighborhoods limit the scope of the present conclusions.