🤖 AI Summary
This study presents the first systematic quantification of multimodal AI-generated content (AIGC) during the 2024 U.S. presidential election on X (formerly Twitter), addressing its prevalence, diffusion structure, and responsible actors. Leveraging large-scale real-world data, we integrate CLIP-based image detection, LLM-powered text detection, social network analysis, and user profiling. Our findings reveal: (1) 12% of election-related images and 1.4% of associated texts are AI-generated; (2) AIGC diffusion follows a pronounced long-tail distribution—just 3% of text and 10% of image disseminators account for 80% of corresponding modality-specific AIGC; (3) ideologically right-leaning, X Premium subscribers exhibiting automated behavioral patterns emerge as “superspreaders,” with modality-specific AIGC usage (e.g., disproportionate image over text generation); (4) AIGC constitutes a significantly higher proportion of profile media among AI-image disseminators. These results expose structural imbalances and systemic risks posed by multimodal AIGC in political communication.
📝 Abstract
While concerns about the risks of AI-generated content (AIGC) to the integrity of social media discussions have been raised, little is known about its scale and the actors responsible for its dissemination online. In this work, we identify and characterize the prevalence, sharing patterns, and spreaders of AIGC in different modalities, including images and texts. Analyzing a large-scale dataset from X related to the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, we find that approximately 12% of images and 1.4% of texts are deemed AI-generated. Notably, roughly 3% of text spreaders and 10% of image spreaders account for 80% of the AI-generated content within their respective modalities. Superspreaders of AIGC are more likely to be X Premium subscribers with a right-leaning orientation and exhibit automated behavior. Additionally, AI image spreaders have a higher proportion of AI-generated content in their profiles compared to AI text spreaders. This study serves as a very first step toward understanding the role generative AI plays in shaping online socio-political environments and offers implications for platform governance.