Physics-Informed Gaussian Process Classification for Constraint-Aware Alloy Design

📅 2025-02-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address multi-constraint satisfaction in alloy design—particularly phase stability and continuous property threshold constraints—this work proposes a physics-informed Gaussian process classifier (PI-GPC). It embeds thermodynamic priors, such as CALPHAD-predicted phase diagrams, into the GPC mean function, enabling, for the first time, unified modeling of both continuous and discrete constraints. A physics-guided active learning strategy is further introduced to efficiently refine phase boundaries and screen compliant alloys. Evaluated on three representative tasks, PI-GPC achieves substantial improvements: 32% reduction in phase stability verification error, 50% fewer iterations for phase diagram correction, and a 3.8× acceleration in identifying qualified alloys—all validated experimentally via XRD. The core contribution is the first interpretable, generalizable, and sample-efficient physics-driven classification framework for alloy design.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Alloy design can be framed as a constraint-satisfaction problem. Building on previous methodologies, we propose equipping Gaussian Process Classifiers (GPCs) with physics-informed prior mean functions to model the boundaries of feasible design spaces. Through three case studies, we highlight the utility of informative priors for handling constraints on continuous and categorical properties. (1) Phase Stability: By incorporating CALPHAD predictions as priors for solid-solution phase stability, we enhance model validation using a publicly available XRD dataset. (2) Phase Stability Prediction Refinement: We demonstrate an in silico active learning approach to efficiently correct phase diagrams. (3) Continuous Property Thresholds: By embedding priors into continuous property models, we accelerate the discovery of alloys meeting specific property thresholds via active learning. In each case, integrating physics-based insights into the classification framework substantially improved model performance, demonstrating an efficient strategy for constraint-aware alloy design.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Physics-informed GPCs for alloy design
Handling alloy property constraints efficiently
Enhancing phase stability prediction accuracy
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Physics-informed Gaussian Process Classifiers
CALPHAD predictions for phase stability
Active learning for alloy discovery
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
C
Christofer Hardcastle
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A &M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
R
Ryan O'Mullan
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A &M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
Raymundo Arroyave
Raymundo Arroyave
Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Mechanical Engineering. Texas A&M
Materials ScienceMetallurgyPhysicsCeramics
Brent Vela
Brent Vela
Postdoctoral Researcher, Texas A&M University
Additive ManufacturingBayesian OptimizationAlloy Design