🤖 AI Summary
Existing forward-entity-matching approaches for Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) struggle with multi-hop reasoning, as they fail to align abstract question intents with concrete entities—leading to broken reasoning paths, information loss, and redundancy.
Method: We propose the Ontology-Guided Reverse-Thinking framework (ORT), introducing a novel “goal → condition” backward-reasoning paradigm that overcomes limitations of conventional forward matching. ORT integrates large language model–based semantic parsing, ontology-structured knowledge graph modeling, and label-level path guidance, operating in three stages to achieve interpretable multi-hop reasoning.
Contribution/Results: ORT achieves state-of-the-art performance on WebQSP and ComplexWebQuestions (CWQ), significantly improving both answer accuracy and reasoning interpretability while preserving fidelity to the underlying knowledge graph semantics.
📝 Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language processing. However, in knowledge graph question answering tasks (KGQA), there remains the issue of answering questions that require multi-hop reasoning. Existing methods rely on entity vector matching, but the purpose of the question is abstract and difficult to match with specific entities. As a result, it is difficult to establish reasoning paths to the purpose, which leads to information loss and redundancy. To address this issue, inspired by human reverse thinking, we propose Ontology-Guided Reverse Thinking (ORT), a novel framework that constructs reasoning paths from purposes back to conditions. ORT operates in three key phases: (1) using LLM to extract purpose labels and condition labels, (2) constructing label reasoning paths based on the KG ontology, and (3) using the label reasoning paths to guide knowledge retrieval. Experiments on the WebQSP and CWQ datasets show that ORT achieves state-of-the-art performance and significantly enhances the capability of LLMs for KGQA.