Comparative Assessment of Deep Learning Architectures for Underwater Subsurface Kelp Forest Segmentation with The Kelp-o-Tron

📅 2026-08-25
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
研究通过比较三种深度学习架构(ResNet34-U-Net、ResNet50-DeepLabV3和混合ResNet50-ASPP-Transformer)来解决水下海带森林分割问题,发现ResNet50-DeepLabV3在准确性和鲁棒性上表现最优。
📝 Abstract
Submerged kelp forests are vital coastal ecosystems that support marine biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics, yet accurate underwater kelp segmentation remains challenging due to optical degradation, illumination variability, turbidity, overlapping vegetation, and complex benthic backgrounds. We systematically evaluated three deep learning semantic segmentation frameworks, ResNet34-U-Net, ResNet50-DeepLabV3, and a hybrid ResNet50-ASPP-Transformer architecture, for kelp detection using high-resolution underwater RGB imagery collected from northeastern U.S. coastal waters. A dataset of 3,395 SSeg assisted annotated image-mask pairs was developed for model training and validation, while geographically independent sites were used for quantitative and qualitative evaluation. All models used consistent preprocessing, augmentation, and evaluation protocols. On independent test data, ResNet50-DeepLabV3 achieved the highest Dice (0.7120) and Intersection over Union (IoU; 0.6267), followed by ResNet34 U Net (Dice 0.6868; IoU 0.5978). The hybrid ASPP Transformer achieved the highest pixel accuracy (0.8528) but lower Dice (0.6437) and IoU (0.5746). External qualitative evaluation further showed that DeepLabV3 produced more consistent segmentation across varying environmental conditions, image qualities, and benthic habitats. Overall, ResNet50-DeepLabV3, termed Kelp-O-Tron, provided the best balance of segmentation accuracy, robustness, and generalization. The dataset, annotation workflow, and comparative evaluation provide resources for advancing automated underwater habitat mapping and ecological monitoring.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Underwater Segmentation
Kelp Forests
Optical Degradation
Illumination Variability
Turbidity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

ResNet50-DeepLabV3
Kelp Segmentation
Underwater Imagery
Semantic Segmentation
Ecosystem Monitoring
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Sundarabalan Balasubramanian
Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125 USA
C
César Borja
DIIS-i3A, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Ana C. Murillo
Ana C. Murillo
Associate Professor, Computer Science, University of Zaragoza
Computer VisionArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningRobotics
L
Lexi N. Wilkes
Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125 USA
M
Meredith L. McPherson
Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125 USA
K
Kira A. Krumhansl
Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, NS, B3A 2T2 Canada
J
Jennifer A. Dijkstra
Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
J
Jarrett E. K. Byrnes
Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125 USA