RecurSE: Bounded Recursive Self-Evaluation for LLM Rubric Judges

📅 2026-08-25
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文提出RecurSE方法,通过模型自我评估生成学习信号以优化自身,无需外部标注,解决了LLM作为评判者时的改进依赖昂贵标注或更强教师的问题。
📝 Abstract
LLM-as-judge is essential for evaluating open-ended text and steering post-training, yet improving the judge itself typically relies on expensive annotations, reward models, or distillation from stronger teachers. In this work, we eliminate external gold supervision from the RL training reward: the model's own evaluative capability generates learning signals for its optimization -- a closed-loop setting of bounded recursive self-improvement (RSI) termed Recursive Self-Evaluation (RecurSE). We study two central questions: when can self-improvement occur, and when must it stop? First, RecurSE pairs a trainable judge evaluating candidate responses under per-rule rubrics (Pass 1) with a synchronized policy-copy checker that audits the judge's reasoning against meta-rubrics to supply a scalar process reward (Pass 2). To enable learning, interface decoupling structurally isolates the checker's scalar score from the judge's verdict tokens, eliminating a degenerative token-copying shortcut that inflates self-assigned rewards. Second, because unanchored recursive learning is inherently bounded, Pairwise Advantage Validity (PAV) serves as an unbiased validation monitor that jointly tracks judge accuracy and checker fidelity to reliably identify the optimal early-stopping window. Across Qwen3.5-9B, Gemma-4-E4B-it, and Qwen3.6-27B, RecurSE achieves consistent generalization gains across held-out medical, pairwise, summarization, and professional benchmarks. Ablations demonstrate that synchronized judge-checker co-evolution outperforms frozen checkers, external meta-judges, self-consistency, and scaled teacher distillation. Furthermore, preference pairs curated by our judge effectively enhance downstream policy alignment. Bounded RSI for LLM-as-judge is thus viable when self-produced reward validity is explicitly decoupled and monitored.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Recursive Self-Evaluation
Bounded Recursive Self-Improvement
Self-Improvement
External Gold Supervision
Learning Signals
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Recursive Self-Evaluation
Bounded Recursive Self-Improvement
Pairwise Advantage Validity
Synchronized Judge-Checker Co-evolution