🤖 AI Summary
Existing formality transfer datasets, such as GYAFC, frame the task as a binary symmetric transformation, leading models to generate “pseudo-formal” text that misaligns with human perceptions of absolute formality. To address this limitation, this work proposes a three-level formality framework—informal, casual, and formal—with “casual” serving as an intermediate anchor, and introduces 3LF, the first parallel dataset enabling continuous-spectrum formality transfer. Through a formal evaluation protocol, fine-tuning experiments across multiple models, and joint analysis using both human judgments and automatic metrics (e.g., F1), the study demonstrates the critical role of supervised structure in achieving style alignment. Training on 3LF substantially improves transfer performance: GPT-4.1-nano’s F1 score on informal-to-formal conversion rises from 0.06 to 0.88, a gain not replicable via in-context learning alone.
📝 Abstract
Formality transfer is commonly framed as a symmetric bidirectional task between informal and formal registers. We argue that this framing conceals a supervision
design flaw in existing benchmarks such as GYAFC: binary human rewrites encode relative stylistic shifts rather than absolute human notions of formality.
Consequently, models learn to generate pseudo-formal outputs that satisfy benchmark labels while failing to produce genuinely formal language. We quantify this
misalignment by re-evaluating benchmark formal labels under a human-aligned definition of formality, revealing substantial discrepancies that propagate to
consistent informal-to-formal failures across model families. To address this issue, we reconceptualize formality transfer as a graded dimension rather than a
binary attribute. We introduce a three-level spectrum: informal, casual, and formal, where casual serves as an explicit intermediate state that clarifies
supervision signals. Based on this framework, we introduce 3LF, a dataset providing parallel supervision across all three levels. Training on 3LF substantially
reduces informal-to-formal failures and improves alignment with human perception. For example, GPT-4.1-nano improves from 0.06 to 0.88 F1 in the informal-to-
formal direction despite 3LF being significantly smaller than GYAFC. We further demonstrate that these gains cannot be reproduced through in-context learning
alone and provide qualitative analyses of ambiguity-driven errors and meaning distortions. Overall, our findings demonstrate how supervision design shapes
stylistic alignment and highlight the importance of alignment-aware benchmark construction in controllable text generation.