Casual as an Anchor: Resolving Supervision Misalignment in Formality Transfer Dataset

📅 2026-05-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing formality transfer datasets, such as GYAFC, frame the task as a binary symmetric transformation, leading models to generate “pseudo-formal” text that misaligns with human perceptions of absolute formality. To address this limitation, this work proposes a three-level formality framework—informal, casual, and formal—with “casual” serving as an intermediate anchor, and introduces 3LF, the first parallel dataset enabling continuous-spectrum formality transfer. Through a formal evaluation protocol, fine-tuning experiments across multiple models, and joint analysis using both human judgments and automatic metrics (e.g., F1), the study demonstrates the critical role of supervised structure in achieving style alignment. Training on 3LF substantially improves transfer performance: GPT-4.1-nano’s F1 score on informal-to-formal conversion rises from 0.06 to 0.88, a gain not replicable via in-context learning alone.
📝 Abstract
Formality transfer is commonly framed as a symmetric bidirectional task between informal and formal registers. We argue that this framing conceals a supervision design flaw in existing benchmarks such as GYAFC: binary human rewrites encode relative stylistic shifts rather than absolute human notions of formality. Consequently, models learn to generate pseudo-formal outputs that satisfy benchmark labels while failing to produce genuinely formal language. We quantify this misalignment by re-evaluating benchmark formal labels under a human-aligned definition of formality, revealing substantial discrepancies that propagate to consistent informal-to-formal failures across model families. To address this issue, we reconceptualize formality transfer as a graded dimension rather than a binary attribute. We introduce a three-level spectrum: informal, casual, and formal, where casual serves as an explicit intermediate state that clarifies supervision signals. Based on this framework, we introduce 3LF, a dataset providing parallel supervision across all three levels. Training on 3LF substantially reduces informal-to-formal failures and improves alignment with human perception. For example, GPT-4.1-nano improves from 0.06 to 0.88 F1 in the informal-to- formal direction despite 3LF being significantly smaller than GYAFC. We further demonstrate that these gains cannot be reproduced through in-context learning alone and provide qualitative analyses of ambiguity-driven errors and meaning distortions. Overall, our findings demonstrate how supervision design shapes stylistic alignment and highlight the importance of alignment-aware benchmark construction in controllable text generation.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

formality transfer
supervision misalignment
stylistic alignment
benchmark design
controllable text generation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

formality transfer
supervision alignment
graded formality
3LF dataset
stylistic control
🔎 Similar Papers