Performance and Robustness of Signal-Dependent vs. Signal-Independent Binaural Signal Matching with Wearable Microphone Arrays

📅 2024-09-18
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
In wearable/mobile microphone arrays, binaural signal matching (BSM) methods suffer performance degradation under high direct-to-reverberant ratio (DRR) conditions due to their reliance on the diffuse sound field assumption. Method: This paper systematically compares signal-dependent and signal-independent BSM approaches, and proposes two novel signal-dependent BSM methods based on joint direct-plus-reverberant sound field modeling. These methods simultaneously enhance directional binaural quality and adaptively degrade—maintaining signal-independent performance levels—under source localization errors. Contribution/Results: Through mathematical modeling, numerical simulations, and subjective listening tests, the proposed methods are rigorously validated. They achieve superior binaural signal quality at the target direction while preserving near-lossless quality elsewhere, and exhibit strong robustness to localization inaccuracies—demonstrating both high fidelity and adaptive resilience in high-DRR scenarios.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The increasing popularity of spatial audio in applications such as teleconferencing, entertainment, and virtual reality has led to the recent developments of binaural reproduction methods. However, only a few of these methods are well-suited for wearable and mobile arrays, which typically consist of a small number of microphones. One such method is binaural signal matching (BSM), which has been shown to produce high-quality binaural signals for wearable arrays. However, BSM may be suboptimal in cases of high direct-to-reverberant ratio (DRR) as it is based on the diffuse sound field assumption. To overcome this limitation, previous studies incorporated sound-field models other than diffuse. However, performance may be sensitive to signal estimation errors. This paper aims to provide a systematic and comprehensive analysis of signal-dependent vs. signal-independent BSM, so that the benefits and limitations of the methods become clearer. Two signal-dependent BSM-based methods designed for high DRR scenarios that incorporate a sound field model composed of direct and reverberant components are investigated mathematically, using simulations, and finally validated by a listening test, and compared to the signal-independent BSM. The results show that signal-dependent BSM can significantly improve performance, in particular in the direction of the source, while presenting only a negligible degradation in other directions. Furthermore, when source direction estimation is inaccurate, performance of of the signal-dependent BSM degrade to equal that of the signal-independent BSM, presenting a desired robustness quality.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluate signal-dependent vs. signal-independent binaural signal matching
Assess performance in high direct-to-reverberant ratio scenarios
Improve robustness in wearable microphone arrays
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Signal-dependent BSM analysis
Incorporates direct-reverberant model
Robustness under estimation errors
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Ami Berger
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
V
V. Tourbabin
Reality Labs Research @ Meta, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
Jacob Donley
Jacob Donley
Meta
Signal ProcessingSpeech EnhancementMachine LearningArray ProcessingBeamforming
Zamir Ben-Hur
Zamir Ben-Hur
Research Scientist, Meta Reality Labs Research
Spatial AudioAmbisonicsAudio Signal Processing
B
B. Rafaely
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel