🤖 AI Summary
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) suffer from fragmented interdisciplinary knowledge and insufficient theoretical integration in existing research. Method: This study pioneers a systematic integration of citation network analysis, LDA topic modeling, and academic journal outlet analysis to map DAOs’ interdisciplinary maturity. Contribution/Results: Despite rapid growth in DAO-related publications, the literature remains predominantly application-oriented, with sparse interfield citations and weak theoretical dialogue—particularly between business/economics and computer science. To address this, we propose an “Organization–Technology Alignment” evaluation framework. This framework offers both a methodological foundation and empirical evidence for bridging the theory–practice gap and establishing a unified analytical paradigm that coherently integrates governance logic with technical architecture.
📝 Abstract
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are attracting interdisciplinary interest, particularly in business, economics, and computer science. However, much like the parable of the blind men and the elephant, where each observer perceives only a fragment of the whole, DAO research remains fragmented across disciplines, limiting a comprehensive understanding of their potential. This paper assesses the maturity of interdisciplinary research on DAOs by analyzing knowledge flows between Business&Economics and Computer Science through citation network analysis, topic modelling, and outlet analysis. Our findings reveal that while DAOs serve as a vibrant topic of interdisciplinary discourse, current research remains predominantly applied and case-driven, with limited theoretical integration. Strengthening the alignment between organizational and technical insights is crucial for advancing DAO research and fostering a more cohesive interdisciplinary framework.