Every Token Leaves a Ripple in the Stream of Thought: Eliciting Model-Internal Token Saliency for Chain-of-Thought Compression

๐Ÿ“… 2026-08-31
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
่ฏฅ็ ”็ฉถ้€š่ฟ‡ๆๅ‡บMISTๆ–นๆณ•๏ผŒๅŸบไบŽๆจกๅž‹ๅ†…้ƒจ็š„ๅฟ…่ฆๆ€งๅ’Œๅ……ๅˆ†ๆ€ง่ฏ„ไผฐไปค็‰Œ้‡่ฆๆ€ง๏ผŒ่งฃๅ†ณไบ†้•ฟ้“พๆŽจ็†ๆˆๆœฌ้ซ˜็š„้—ฎ้ข˜ใ€‚
๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning improves multi-step problem solving, but long reasoning traces inflate inference cost. Token-level CoT compression reduces this cost by pruning full reasoning chains into shorter traces for model adaptation, making token selection the central challenge. Existing methods often rely on external scorers or heuristic signals only indirectly tied to the model's internal answer computation. We instead adopt a model-internal perspective: as the model forms an answer, each reasoning token leaves a ripple in the residual stream, the model's \emph{stream of thought}, and the magnitude of this ripple reflects the token's contribution to the answer computation. Building on this view, we propose \textsc{MIST} (Model-Internal Saliency for Token-level CoT compression), which defines token importance along two complementary axes: \emph{necessity}, the drop in answer likelihood when a token's internal contribution is removed, and \emph{sufficiency}, the gain in answer likelihood when that contribution alone is provided. Combining the two yields a unified importance score for pruning. Across four reasoning benchmarks and four models, \textsc{MIST} consistently outperforms baseline methods, suggesting that model-internal saliency provides an effective proxy for reasoning-token importance.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Chain-of-Thought
Compression
Token-level
Inference Cost
Reasoning
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Model-Internal Saliency
Token-level Compression
Necessity and Sufficiency