Information-Based Calibration of Uncertainty Quantification in Product-of-Experts Gaussian Process Models

📅 2026-08-29
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
为解决高斯过程模型中局部专家导致的后验方差过高问题,提出了一种基于信息的方法GP-pro-c来校准不确定性量化,同时保持预测准确性并降低计算复杂度。
📝 Abstract
Gaussian process (GP) regression with a single global GP (GP-glo) incurs cubic computational cost, limiting scalability to large datasets. Product-of-experts GP models (GP-pro), which combine local GP models to capture global correlations, alleviate this computational burden. However, training local experts on disjoint data subsets can lead to overestimated posterior variances. We propose GP-pro-c, a product-of-experts GP model that calibrates these variances using an information-based method. The method exploits the monotonicity and submodularity of information gain in GPs to define a calibration ratio that reduces the posterior variance of individual local GP models. We evaluate GP-pro-c using negative log-likelihood (NLL), root mean squared error (RMSE), and expected normalised calibration error (ENCE). Experiments on four synthetic functions and six regression datasets show that GP-pro-c achieves average reductions of 2.3% in NLL and 12.0% in ENCE compared with the uncalibrated GP-pro model. The proposed method mitigates posterior variance overestimation while maintaining predictive accuracy and reducing computational complexity. GP-pro-c provides a promising approach for uncertainty estimation in scalable GP models and may serve as a useful surrogate model for Bayesian optimisation with high-dimensional and large-scale data.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Gaussian Process
Product-of-Experts
Uncertainty Quantification
Posterior Variance
Calibration
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

information-based calibration
product-of-experts GP models
posterior variance overestimation
monotonicity and submodularity of information gain
🔎 Similar Papers
2023-03-04International Conference on Learning RepresentationsCitations: 13