Saturation in G: simple & robust causal inference in cluster randomized trials with informative cluster sizes

📅 2026-08-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文针对具有信息性集群大小的集群随机试验中治疗效果估计问题,提出了一种简单且稳健的方法:通过饱和集群大小模型与g-计算来准确估计个体和集群平均治疗效果。
📝 Abstract
Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) can exhibit informative cluster sizes (ICS) where cluster size is associated with outcomes and/or treatment effects. Under ICS, the individual and cluster-average treatment effects (iATE, cATE) can diverge, and the conventional linear mixed-effects model (LMM) and generalized estimating equation (GEE) with an exchangeable working correlation can produce data-dependent weighted contrasts that are not consistent for either estimand. In these settings with ICS, we propose easy to implement "cluster-size saturated models with g-computation" (CS-g), which employ a simple two-step adjustment to standard practice: (1.) augment the appropriately weighted working LMM or GEE with a saturated continuous cluster-size main effect and treatment x cluster-size interaction, and (2.) apply g-computation to target an interpretable marginal estimand. We prove that the appropriately weighted cluster-size saturated LMM with g-computation and more general cluster-size saturated GEE with g-computation can consistently target the iATE and cATE, among a broad class of interpretable estimands, while allowing for ICS. Crucially, this consistency holds under arbitrary misspecification of other model components, including the functional form of the saturated cluster-size terms. Furthermore, we demonstrate exact finite-sample equivalence between these consistent CS-g estimators and their model-robust standardization counterparts. Across simulations with continuous and binary outcomes, the proposed CS-g estimators were unbiased, more efficient than other consistent estimators, and returned greater power to detect ICS. A re-analysis of the PPACT P-CRT further illustrates the approach. Altogether, CS-g offers a simple, robust, and efficient route to target interpretable marginal effects in P-CRTs with ICS.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Cluster Randomized Trials
Informative Cluster Sizes
Treatment Effects
Linear Mixed-Effects Model
Generalized Estimating Equation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

cluster-size saturated models
g-computation
informative cluster sizes (ICS)
individual average treatment effect (iATE)
cluster average treatment effect (cATE)
🔎 Similar Papers
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
K
Kenneth M. Lee
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Clinical Trials Innovation, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Clinical Trials Methods and Outcomes Lab, Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
M
Michael O. Harhay
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Clinical Trials Innovation, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Clinical Trials Methods and Outcomes Lab, Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Fan Li
Fan Li
Department of Statistical Science, Duke University
statisticscausal inferencecomparative effectiveness researchmissing dataBayesian