Engaging the scientific community in high-quality biocuration: a report on the International Society for Biocuration workshop, 'Maximizing community curation for the benefit of all'

📅 2026-08-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
为解决生物知识库更新维护资源不足的问题,通过组织研讨会探讨社区策展方法及其最佳实践和工具,以提高数据质量和时效性。
📝 Abstract
Biological knowledgebases traditionally rely on expert, professional curation of the research literature to maintain up-to-date collections of data organized in machine-readable form. However, despite the increasing amount of curatable biomedical knowledge, support for knowledgebases is declining, leaving these resources no alternative but to explore additional ways of updating and maintaining content. One way in which knowledgebases have addressed this problem is by engaging researchers to help curate their published papers, a process generally known as 'community curation'. As helpful as community curation can be, though, it is not universally adopted and, for groups that do have it, there is a wide range of approaches. To learn about existing community curation pipelines and explore possibilities for working towards a common approach, we organized a workshop, Maximizing Community Curation for the Benefit of All, at the 18th International Biocuration Conference, hosted by the Stowers Institute for Medical Research. Our aim was to examine the different strategies that groups use, share successes, failures, and ongoing challenges, and produce suggested deliverables for broader adoption of common best practices and tools for effective community curation. Representatives from 18 different resources, ranging from model organism and specialty knowledgebases to journals and literature resources, presented their work. The result was a comprehensive assessment of the state-of-the-art for community curation and an in-depth discussion on how community curation can become standard practice for maintaining timely, highquality biological resources that will continue to provide scientists with the essential information they need for their research.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

biocuration
community curation
knowledgebases
research literature
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

community curation
biocuration
knowledgebases
best practices
biomedical knowledge
🔎 Similar Papers
D
Daniela Raciti
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States
S
Susan L. M. Coort
Department of Translational Genomics, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
C
Christian Grove
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States
J
Jade Hotchkiss
Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, South Africa
M
Matt Jeffryes
Literature Services, EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
N
Nancy T. Li
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada
Zhiyong Lu
Zhiyong Lu
Senior Investigator, NLM; Adjunct Professor of CS, UIUC
BioNLPBiomedical InformaticsMedical AIArtificial Intelligence
B
Bastien Molcrette
GigaScience Press, BGI Hong Kong Tech Co Ltd., 26F A Kings Wing Plaza 2, 1 On Kwan Street, Shek Mun, Sha Tin, NT, Hong Kong SAR
S
Sushma Naithani
Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States
M
Maria Victoria Nugnes
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy
J
Jolene Ramsey
Department of Biology, Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
R
Rene Ranzinger
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, The University of Georgia, 314 Riverbend Rd, Athens, GA 30602, United States
L
Leonore Reiser
Phoenix Bioinformatics, 39899 Balentine Drive, Suite 200, Newark, CA 94560, United States
K
Karen E. Ross
Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, United States
G
Garrett Stevens
Department of Biology, Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
C
Courtney Thaxton
Department of Biology, Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
S
Sabrina Toro
Department of Biology, Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
Valerie Wood
Valerie Wood
Department of Biology, Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
K
Karen Yook
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States
K
Kimberly Van Auken
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States