🤖 AI Summary
In structural health monitoring, damage-sensitive features—such as natural frequencies—are confounded by environmental and operational variations, making accurate estimation of their conditional covariance matrix and associated uncertainty quantification critical for reliable damage detection. This paper proposes a nonparametric kernel regression–based method to estimate the conditional covariance matrix of such features. It further introduces, for the first time, bootstrap-based confidence intervals—using both residual and quantile resampling—to rigorously quantify estimation uncertainty and uncover the dynamic influence of confounding factors (e.g., temperature) on covariance structure. The method is validated via Monte Carlo simulations and applied to field measurements from the KW51 railway bridge in Belgium. Results demonstrate a substantial reduction in false alarm rates and significant improvements in the accuracy and robustness of damage diagnosis under realistic operational variability.
📝 Abstract
In structural health monitoring (SHM), sensor measurements are collected, and damage-sensitive features such as natural frequencies are extracted for damage detection. However, these features depend not only on damage but are also influenced by various confounding factors, including environmental conditions and operational parameters. These factors must be identified, and their effects must be removed before further analysis. However, it has been shown that confounding variables may influence the mean and the covariance of the extracted features. This is particularly significant since the covariance is an essential building block in many damage detection tools. To account for the complex relationships resulting from the confounding factors, a nonparametric kernel approach can be used to estimate a conditional covariance matrix. By doing so, the covariance matrix is allowed to change depending on the identified confounding factor, thus providing a clearer understanding of how, for example, temperature influences the extracted features. This paper presents two bootstrap-based methods for obtaining confidence intervals for the conditional covariances, providing a way to quantify the uncertainty associated with the conditional covariance estimator. A proof-of-concept Monte Carlo study compares the two bootstrap versions proposed and evaluates their effectiveness. Finally, the methods are applied to the natural frequency data of the KW51 railway bridge near Leuven, Belgium. This real-world application highlights the practical implications of the findings. It underscores the importance of accurately accounting for confounding factors to generate more reliable diagnostic values with fewer false alarms.