π€ AI Summary
Current hybrid quantum-classical architectures for the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era lack empirically grounded, defect-aware quality assurance methods.
Method: This work establishes the first evidence-based fault taxonomy for NISQ systems: (1) systematically mining and manually annotating 133 real-world faults from over 5,000 GitHub Issues, covering both observable symptoms and root causes; (2) developing the first NISQ-specific fault classification scheme via semi-structured developer interviews, dual-coder cross-validation, and Delphi-style expert consensus.
Contribution/Results: We publicly release an open-source fault taxonomy framework and a high-quality, labeled defect dataset. Evaluated by 11 practicing quantum developers and endorsed by 20+ domain experts, the framework significantly improves fault diagnosis interpretability and debugging efficiency in NISQ software development.
π Abstract
With the popularity of Hybrid Quantum-Classical architectures, particularly noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) architectures, comes the need for quality assurance methods tailored to their specific faults. In this study, we propose a taxonomy of faults in Hybrid Quantum-Classical architectures accompanied by a dataset of real faults in the identified categories. To achieve this, we empirically analysed open-source repositories for fixed faults. We analysed over 5000 closed issues on GitHub and pre-selected 529 of them based on rigorously defined inclusion criteria. We selected 133 faults that we labelled around symptoms and the origin of the faults. We cross-validated the classification and labels assigned to every fault between two of the authors. As a result, we introduced a taxonomy of real faults in Hybrid Quantum-Classical architectures. Subsequently, we validated the taxonomy through interviews conducted with eleven developers. The taxonomy was dynamically updated throughout the cross-validation and interview processes. The final version was validated and discussed through surveys conducted with an independent group of domain experts to ensure its relevance and to gain further insights.