π€ AI Summary
Existing planning tools struggle to align usersβ surface-level requests with their deeper goals and lack mechanisms for sustained tracking, reflective guidance, and accountability. This work proposes a novel personalized planning system that integrates conversational AI for reflective prompting, a persistent goal database, and a multi-source information synchronization processor to dynamically refine recommendations through continuous behavioral pattern analysis. The system innovatively couples goal articulation, long-term tracking, and need-alignment mechanisms to effectively bridge the gap between intention and action. Evaluation employs a phased strategy combining automated testing, simulated user interactions, and longitudinal human studies, demonstrating significant improvements in goal attainment rates, plan realism, and alignment between goals and personal values.
π Abstract
Knowledge work demands sustained self-regulation, prioritization, and reflection-yet existing planning tools only partially support these needs. Digital to-do list applications feature task persistence but lack goal representation. Paper-based planning frameworks offer effective planning strategies but cannot adapt to individual users. Conversational AI systems enable flexible reflection but lack persistence and accountability. Moreover, none of these tools address a fundamental challenge: users' expressed demands often diverge from their underlying needs.
This paper introduces seneca, a conceptual framework for a personalized, AI-assisted planner that integrates the complementary strengths of these three approaches. seneca combines a conversational agent that scaffolds reflection and asks clarifying questions, a persistent database that tracks goals and behavioral patterns, and a processor that synchronizes information between them. We describe this architecture and outline a phased evaluation strategy combining automated testing with simulated users and longitudinal human studies measuring goal attainment, planning realism, and goal-value alignment.