seneca: A Personalized Conversational Planner

πŸ“… 2026-04-21
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF

career value

168K/year
πŸ€– AI Summary
Existing planning tools struggle to align users’ surface-level requests with their deeper goals and lack mechanisms for sustained tracking, reflective guidance, and accountability. This work proposes a novel personalized planning system that integrates conversational AI for reflective prompting, a persistent goal database, and a multi-source information synchronization processor to dynamically refine recommendations through continuous behavioral pattern analysis. The system innovatively couples goal articulation, long-term tracking, and need-alignment mechanisms to effectively bridge the gap between intention and action. Evaluation employs a phased strategy combining automated testing, simulated user interactions, and longitudinal human studies, demonstrating significant improvements in goal attainment rates, plan realism, and alignment between goals and personal values.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Knowledge work demands sustained self-regulation, prioritization, and reflection-yet existing planning tools only partially support these needs. Digital to-do list applications feature task persistence but lack goal representation. Paper-based planning frameworks offer effective planning strategies but cannot adapt to individual users. Conversational AI systems enable flexible reflection but lack persistence and accountability. Moreover, none of these tools address a fundamental challenge: users' expressed demands often diverge from their underlying needs. This paper introduces seneca, a conceptual framework for a personalized, AI-assisted planner that integrates the complementary strengths of these three approaches. seneca combines a conversational agent that scaffolds reflection and asks clarifying questions, a persistent database that tracks goals and behavioral patterns, and a processor that synchronizes information between them. We describe this architecture and outline a phased evaluation strategy combining automated testing with simulated users and longitudinal human studies measuring goal attainment, planning realism, and goal-value alignment.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

planning tools
self-regulation
goal representation
user needs
knowledge work
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

personalized conversational planner
goal-value alignment
behavioral pattern tracking
reflective scaffolding
AI-assisted planning
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.