NeuroAI and Beyond: Bridging Between Advances in Neuroscience and ArtificialIntelligence

📅 2026-04-18
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

255K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses three critical bottlenecks in contemporary artificial intelligence: limited physical interaction capabilities, fragile learning mechanisms, and poor energy and data efficiency. It proposes a novel framework that systematically translates core principles from neuroscience into AI design, integrating co-design of body and controller, predictive interaction, multi-scale neuromodulatory learning, hierarchical distributed architectures, and sparse event-driven computation. By unifying these biologically inspired strategies, the framework offers a viable pathway to overcome current AI limitations while simultaneously advancing our understanding of biological neural computation. This approach establishes both theoretical and practical foundations for the emerging field of NeuroAI and fosters interdisciplinary talent development and institutional innovation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence (AI) have made impressive progress in recent years but remain only loosely interconnected. Based on a workshop convened by the National Science Foundation in August 2025, we identify three fundamental capability gaps in current AI: the inability to interact with the physical world, inadequate learning that produces brittle systems, and unsustainable energy and data inefficiency. We describe the neuroscience principles that address each: co-design of body and controller, prediction through interaction, multi-scale learning with neuromodulatory control, hierarchical distributed architectures, and sparse event-driven computation. We present a research roadmap organized around these principles at near, mid, and long-term horizons. We argue that realizing this program requires a new generation of researchers trained across the boundary between neuroscience and engineering, and describe the institutional conditions: interdisciplinary training, hardware access, community standards, and ethics, needed to support them. We conclude that NeuroAI, neuroscience-informed artificial intelligence, has the potential to overcome limitations of current AI while deepening our understanding of biological neural computation.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

physical interaction
brittle learning
energy inefficiency
data inefficiency
AI limitations
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

NeuroAI
neuromodulatory control
event-driven computation
multi-scale learning
embodied intelligence
Anthony Zador
Anthony Zador
Professor of Biology, CSHL
neuroscience
J
Jean-Marc Fellous
Mathematics Department, Kalaheo High School, Kailua, HI, USA; Institute for Neural Computation, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Terrence Sejnowski
Terrence Sejnowski
Francis Crick Professor, Salk Institute, Distingished Professor, UC San Diego
Computational NeuroscienceArtificial Intelligence
G
Gina Adam
Dept. Electrical & Computer Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
James B Aimone
James B Aimone
Sandia National Laboratories
Computational NeuroscienceAdult NeurogenesisTheoretical NeuroscienceNeuromorphic Computing
A
Akwasi Akwaboah
Dept. Electrical & Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Y
Yiannis Aloimonos
Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
C
Carmen Amo Alonso
Dept. Aeronautics & Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Chiara Bartolozzi
Chiara Bartolozzi
Researcher, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
Neuromorphic engineering
M
Michael J. Bennington
Dept. Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Michael Berry
Michael Berry
Professor, Montana State University, University of Washington
ConcreteStructural EngineeringBridgesSeismic
B
Bing W. Brunton
Dept. Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Gert Cauwenberghs
Gert Cauwenberghs
Professor of Bioengineering and Co-Director, Institute for Neural Computation, UC San Diego
Neuromorphic engineeringlearning systemsneural interfacesbioinstrumentation
H
Hillel J. Chiel
Depts. Biology, Neurosciences & Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
Tobi Delbruck
Tobi Delbruck
Inst. of Neuroinformatics, UZH-ETH Zurich
Neuromorphic electronic engineering
John Doyle
John Doyle
Caltech
control theorysystems biologycomplex networksrobustnessarchitecture
J
Jason Eshraghian
Dept. Electrical & Computer Engineering, UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Ralph Etienne-Cummings
Ralph Etienne-Cummings
Johns Hopkins University
Neuromorphic EngineeringApplied NeuroscienceRoboticsProsthetics
Cornelia Fermuller
Cornelia Fermuller
Research Scientist, Computer Vision and Human Vision, University of Maryland
Robot PerceptionComputer VisionEvent based VisionBio-inspired Computation
M
Matthew Jacobsen
Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
A
Ali A. Minai
Dept. Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
B
Barbara Oakley
Dept. Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA
A
Alexander G. Ororbia II
Dept. Computer Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA
J
Joe Paton
Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
Blake Richards
Blake Richards
Mila + McGill University
Machine LearningLearning and MemoryNeural NetworksNeural Circuits