🤖 AI Summary
This paper studies optimal contest design under a fixed budget constraint, jointly optimizing the entry cap and prize structure to maximize either individual effort or aggregate effort. Methodologically, it fully characterizes the symmetric Bayesian Nash equilibrium in an n-player symmetric Bayesian game with entry restrictions, enabling derivation of the unique optimal mechanism for each objective. The analysis reveals a fundamental trade-off: maximizing aggregate effort necessitates allocating the entire budget to a single high-value prize, whereas maximizing individual effort requires precisely calibrating the entry cap and adopting a graded multi-prize structure. Integrating tools from game theory, mechanism design, and optimization, the study yields closed-form analytical solutions that explicitly quantify the tension between budget allocation efficiency and participation incentives.
📝 Abstract
This paper explores the design of contests involving $n$ contestants, focusing on how the designer decides on the number of contestants allowed and the prize structure with a fixed budget. We characterize the unique symmetric Bayesian Nash equilibrium of contestants and find the optimal contests design for the maximum individual effort objective and the total effort objective.