π€ AI Summary
This work addresses the limitations of current model retraining practices, which often rely on fixed schedules lacking theoretical grounding and auditability. The authors formulate retraining as an approximate Bayesian inference problem under computational constraints and introduce the notion of βlearning debtβ to develop an evidence-based, dynamic triggering mechanism. Within a decision-theoretic framework, the retraining decision is cast as a loss-driven cost minimization problem, with optimal retraining times determined through threshold analysis. This approach yields a data-driven, interpretable, and auditable retraining strategy that not only maintains model performance but also enhances governance transparency.
π Abstract
Model retraining is usually treated as an ongoing maintenance task. But as Harrison Katz now argues, retraining can be better understood as approximate Bayesian inference under computational constraints. The gap between a continuously updated belief state and your frozen deployed model is "learning debt," and the retraining decision is a cost minimization problem with a threshold that falls out of your loss function. In this article Katz provides a decision-theoretic framework for retraining policies. The result is evidence-based triggers that replace calendar schedules and make governance auditable. For readers less familiar with the Bayesian and decision-theoretic language, key terms are defined in a glossary at the end of the article.