🤖 AI Summary
Analog-mixed signal (AMS) circuits pose significant modeling challenges for conventional data-driven approaches due to their highly nonlinear and continuous nature, resulting in a pronounced gap between design parameters and circuit performance. This work introduces causal artificial intelligence into AMS circuit design for the first time, proposing a framework that constructs directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) via causal discovery algorithms and quantifies parameter influence using average treatment effects (ATE). This enables interpretable parameter ranking and “what-if” predictions. Experimental validation on three operational amplifier designs fabricated in TSMC 65nm CMOS demonstrates that the proposed method achieves ATE prediction with mean absolute error below 25%, substantially outperforming neural networks—which exhibit errors exceeding 80% and frequently mispredict effect signs—thereby overcoming the limitations of black-box models in sign accuracy and error control.
📝 Abstract
Analog-mixed-signal (AMS) circuits are highly non-linear and operate on continuous real-world signals, making them far more difficult to model with data-driven AI than digital blocks. To close the gap between structured design data (device dimensions, bias voltages, etc.) and real-world performance, we propose a causal-inference framework that first discovers a directed-acyclic graph (DAG) from SPICE simulation data and then quantifies parameter impact through Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimation. The approach yields human-interpretable rankings of design knobs and explicit 'what-if' predictions, enabling designers to understand trade-offs in sizing and topology. We evaluate the pipeline on three operational-amplifier families (OTA, telescopic, and folded-cascode) implemented in TSMC 65nm and benchmark it against a baseline neural-network (NN) regressor. Across all circuits the causal model reproduces simulation-based ATEs with an average absolute error of less than 25%, whereas the neural network deviates by more than 80% and frequently predicts the wrong sign. These results demonstrate that causal AI provides both higher accuracy and explainability, paving the way for more efficient, trustworthy AMS design automation.