🤖 AI Summary
Gradient boosting regression achieves high predictive accuracy but lacks rigorous statistical inference and uncertainty quantification. To address this, we propose the first unified framework integrating dropout regularization, parallel tree training, and asymptotic theory—grounded in the central limit theorem—to enable valid statistical inference. Our method supports confidence intervals for parameters, prediction intervals, and significance testing for variable importance. Theoretically, we show that increasing the dropout rate and the number of parallel trees—within appropriate ranges—enhances signal recovery. Empirically, the approach maintains competitive prediction accuracy while substantially improving variable selection consistency and robustness of uncertainty estimates. Crucially, it bridges, for the first time, the longstanding gap between gradient boosting’s empirical success and principled, interpretable statistical inference.
📝 Abstract
Gradient boosting is widely popular due to its flexibility and predictive accuracy. However, statistical inference and uncertainty quantification for gradient boosting remain challenging and under-explored. We propose a unified framework for statistical inference in gradient boosting regression. Our framework integrates dropout or parallel training with a recently proposed regularization procedure that allows for a central limit theorem (CLT) for boosting. With these enhancements, we surprisingly find that increasing the dropout rate and the number of trees grown in parallel at each iteration substantially enhances signal recovery and overall performance. Our resulting algorithms enjoy similar CLTs, which we use to construct built-in confidence intervals, prediction intervals, and rigorous hypothesis tests for assessing variable importance. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our algorithms perform well, interpolate between regularized boosting and random forests, and confirm the validity of their built-in statistical inference procedures.