Legal Alignment for Safe and Ethical AI

📅 2026-01-07
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses a longstanding gap in AI alignment research—the underutilization of law as a critical source of normative and technical constraints. It introduces a novel “legal alignment” paradigm that systematically integrates legal rules, interpretive methodologies, and institutional structures into AI development. The framework advances three core directions: formal modeling of legal norms, reasoning mechanisms grounded in legal interpretation, and compliance-oriented evaluation and governance architectures. By deeply embedding legal knowledge systems into the foundations of AI alignment, this study provides both theoretical grounding and technical pathways for building lawful, trustworthy, and collaboratively capable AI systems. Furthermore, it fosters interdisciplinary synergy between legal scholarship and artificial intelligence, enabling the institutional implementation of legal alignment in real-world applications.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Alignment of artificial intelligence (AI) encompasses the normative problem of specifying how AI systems should act and the technical problem of ensuring AI systems comply with those specifications. To date, AI alignment has generally overlooked an important source of knowledge and practice for grappling with these problems: law. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by exploring how legal rules, principles, and methods can be leveraged to address problems of alignment and inform the design of AI systems that operate safely and ethically. This emerging field -- legal alignment -- focuses on three research directions: (1) designing AI systems to comply with the content of legal rules developed through legitimate institutions and processes, (2) adapting methods from legal interpretation to guide how AI systems reason and make decisions, and (3) harnessing legal concepts as a structural blueprint for confronting challenges of reliability, trust, and cooperation in AI systems. These research directions present new conceptual, empirical, and institutional questions, which include examining the specific set of laws that particular AI systems should follow, creating evaluations to assess their legal compliance in real-world settings, and developing governance frameworks to support the implementation of legal alignment in practice. Tackling these questions requires expertise across law, computer science, and other disciplines, offering these communities the opportunity to collaborate in designing AI for the better.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

AI alignment
legal compliance
ethical AI
law
AI safety
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Legal Alignment
AI Alignment
Legal Interpretation
Ethical AI
AI Governance
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
N
Noam Kolt
Hebrew University
N
Nicholas Caputo
Oxford Martin AI Governance Initiative
J
Jack Boeglin
University of Pennsylvania
C
Cullen O'Keefe
Institute for Law & AI, Centre for the Governance of AI
Rishi Bommasani
Rishi Bommasani
CS PhD, Stanford University
Societal Impact of AIAI PolicyAI GovernanceFoundation Models
Stephen Casper
Stephen Casper
PhD student, MIT
AI safetyAI responsibilityred-teamingrobustnessauditing
M
Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
N
Noah Feldman
Harvard University
Iason Gabriel
Iason Gabriel
Senior Staff Research Scientist, Google DeepMind
Political TheoryMoral PhilosophyPhilosophy of AIGlobal JusticeHuman Rights
Gillian K. Hadfield
Gillian K. Hadfield
Johns Hopkins University, Dept of Computer Science and School of Government and Policy
AI policygovernance and safetyhuman and machine normative systems
Lewis Hammond
Lewis Hammond
University of Oxford
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningGame TheoryFormal VerificationAI Safety
Peter Henderson
Peter Henderson
Princeton University
Machine LearningLaw
Atoosa Kasirzadeh
Atoosa Kasirzadeh
Carnegie Mellon University
AI EthicsAI GovernancePhilosophyMathematical Optimization
Seth Lazar
Seth Lazar
Australian National University
Ethicspolitical philosophyethics of riskethics of warmoral and political philosophy of AI
Anka Reuel
Anka Reuel
CS Ph.D. Candidate, Stanford University
AI GovernanceResponsible AIAI EthicsAI Safety
Kevin L. Wei
Kevin L. Wei
RAND; Harvard Law School
AI evaluationAI safetyAI governanceprivate lawempirical legal studies
Jonathan Zittrain
Jonathan Zittrain
George Bemis Prof. of Law, Prof. of Computer Science, and Prof. of Public Policy, Harvard University
internet architectureprivacypropertyspeechgovernance