π€ AI Summary
Existing process reward models (PRMs) treat step-wise evaluation as independent classification tasks, neglecting dependencies among reasoning stepsβleading to coarse-grained and suboptimal reward distributions. This work formalizes PRM learning as a Markov decision process (MDP) for the first time and introduces a Q-value-based ranking loss to enable fine-grained, theoretically grounded process-level reward learning. Our method integrates Q-value modeling, multi-policy sampling, process-level supervision within a reinforcement learning framework, and backbone-agnostic model adaptation. On multi-step reasoning benchmarks, it consistently outperforms classification-based PRMs. Ablation studies confirm that the proposed comparative loss is the primary driver of performance gains, significantly improving stability and generalization across diverse language models and sampling strategies.
π Abstract
Process Reward Modeling (PRM) is critical for complex reasoning and decision-making tasks where the accuracy of intermediate steps significantly influences the overall outcome. Existing PRM approaches, primarily framed as classification problems, employ cross-entropy loss to independently evaluate each step's correctness. This method can lead to suboptimal reward distribution and does not adequately address the interdependencies among steps. To address these limitations, we introduce the Process Q-value Model (PQM), a novel framework that redefines PRM in the context of a Markov Decision Process. PQM optimizes Q-value rankings based on a novel comparative loss function, enhancing the model's ability to capture the intricate dynamics among sequential decisions. This approach provides a more granular and theoretically grounded methodology for process rewards. Our extensive empirical evaluations across various sampling policies, language model backbones, and multi-step reasoning benchmarks show that PQM outperforms classification-based PRMs. The effectiveness of the comparative loss function is highlighted in our comprehensive ablation studies, confirming PQM's practical efficacy and theoretical advantage.