Integrating spectral and morphological plant features with decision-tree models for early-season cotton biomass and nitrogen status estimation from multi-year UAV data

📅 2026-08-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the need for precise estimation of biomass and nitrogen status during early cotton growth to support variable-rate fertilization. By integrating spectral indices derived from UAV-based multispectral imagery with morphological traits—such as plant height and canopy cover—and employing machine learning models including Random Forest Regression (RFR) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), the research predicts dry matter weight, plant nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen concentration. Innovatively leveraging multi-year field trials with spatiotemporally consistent spectral and morphological features, the study evaluates model generalizability through leave-one-year-out cross-validation. Results demonstrate that RFR and XGB achieve superior performance, with mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for nitrogen concentration estimation below 8%. The derived Nitrogen Nutrition Index effectively discriminates among multiple levels of nitrogen stress.
📝 Abstract
Precision nitrogen (N) management (PNM) for cotton requires in-season monitoring of crop growth parameters and N status indicators to decide fertilizer timing, placement, and application rates for optimal canopy development and yield. This study developed remote sensing and machine learning-based methods to estimate cotton dry biomass weight (DBW), plant N uptake (PNU), plant N concentration (PNC), critical N dilution (Nc), and nitrogen nutrition index (NNI) to support PNM. To achieve this, a three-year field-based N-management study was conducted and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based multispectral images were acquired between early vegetative growth and flowering stages, critical for fertilizer applications. Spatiotemporally consistent spectral and morphological plant features, including plant height (PH) and fractional canopy cover (FCC), provided reliable model training inputs. DBW, PNU, and PNC estimates from simple regression using vegetation indices (VIs), multiple linear regression (MLR) combining VIs, PH, and FCC, and decision-tree models, random forest regression (RFR) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), combining spectral reflectance, PH, and FCC were evaluated using trial-held-out (THO) and leave-one-year-out (LOYO) validation methods. The best validation accuracies were from RFRTHO (R2 = 0.88 and MAPE = 23.14% for DBW; R2 = 0.84 and MAPE = 20.61% for PNU; R2 = 0.85 and MAPE = 7.82% for PNC) and XGBTHO (R2 = 0.87 and MAPE = 21.91% for DBW; R2 = 0.81 and MAPE = 21.40% for PNU; R2 = 0.86 and MAPE = 7.66% for PNC). Nc was calculated from model estimated DBW and PNC for high-yielding, medium-to-tall cotton varieties grown in the Texas Coastal Plains and validated using ground-truth biomass measurements. NNI derived from XGBTHO outputs performed marginally better than NNI from RFRTHO in identifying N-deficient plots and multi-level N-stress categorization.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

cotton biomass
nitrogen status
precision nitrogen management
UAV remote sensing
early-season estimation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

UAV remote sensing
decision-tree models
nitrogen nutrition index
morphological features
precision nitrogen management
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
V
Vaishali Swaminathan
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA; Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
Nithya Rajan
Nithya Rajan
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
J
J Alex Thomasson
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA; Mississippi Water Resources Research Institute, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, USA
A
Amrit Shrestha
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA; Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA
K
Karem Meza Capcha
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA; Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA
R
Robert Hardin
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
P
Pramod Pokhrel
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA; Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, California, USA