GATES: Self-Distillation under Privileged Context with Consensus Gating

📅 2026-02-24
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of self-distillation in document-grounded question answering under an asymmetric setting where documents are available during training but absent at test time, and no ground-truth labels or external supervision exist. The authors propose a consensus-gated self-distillation approach based on multi-trajectory sampling: a teacher model generates multiple reasoning trajectories, and their consensus serves as a dynamic reliability signal to modulate knowledge distillation. Crucially, the full reasoning trajectories—not just final answers—are used to train the student model. This method extracts stable, dense supervision signals from online-generated trajectories without assuming the teacher is always correct. Experiments show that it improves accuracy from 46.0% to 62.0% in in-domain asymmetric evaluation and boosts maj@8 accuracy from 20.2% to 35.4% on a document-free mathematical reasoning benchmark.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We study self-distillation in settings where supervision is unreliable: there are no ground truth labels, verifiable rewards, or external graders to evaluate answers. We focus on document-grounded question answering with asymmetric context, where a single model serves as both tutor (with access to a relevant source document during training) and student (answering from the question alone at test time). Rather than assuming tutor correctness, we derive supervision online from tutor consensus by sampling multiple document-grounded reasoning traces and using agreement to gate learning. Conditioned on this reliability signal, we distill knowledge through full tutor reasoning trajectories (not just final answers), providing a dense and stable learning signal. Empirically, this consensus-gated trajectory distillation substantially improves transfer to the document-free student. Held-out in-domain accuracy under asymmetric evaluation improves from 46.0\% to 62.0\%, and average (maj@8) accuracy on public document-free math benchmarks improves from 20.2\% to 35.4\%.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

self-distillation
unreliable supervision
document-grounded QA
asymmetric context
consensus gating
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

self-distillation
consensus gating
trajectory distillation
asymmetric context
document-grounded QA
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.