🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the contested narrative that immigrants disproportionately strain welfare systems by rigorously quantifying the distinct impacts of migration and population aging on three core public services—housing, education, and healthcare—in Europe, with a focus on Austria through 2050. Employing the first nationally calibrated structural population model disaggregated by nationality and subnational region, combined with multi-scenario forecasting and demand decomposition analysis, the research demonstrates that healthcare pressures are driven overwhelmingly by native-born aging—4.7 times more than by immigration—while net housing demand is entirely attributable to immigrant inflows. Although overall educational demand declines, future pupils will increasingly originate from foreign-national households. Crucially, service utilization by foreign nationals aligns precisely with their demographic weight, revealing no evidence of overuse and thereby challenging prevailing political discourse while highlighting the heterogeneous sources of sector-specific pressures.
📝 Abstract
Political discourse attributes the pressure on European welfare systems to foreign nationals. Yet projections of service demand rarely disaggregate service demand by citizenship status. We develop a structural demographic model and project healthcare, education, and housing demand in Austria through 2050, disaggregated by citizenship status and regions across migration scenarios. We find that migration, ageing, and fertility shape each sector differently. In healthcare, the ageing of Austrian nationals contributes 4.7 times more to demand growth than immigration, with the most acute pressures in rural, low-migration regions. In housing, migration accounts for the entire net growth in demand, concentrated in metropolitan hubs. In education, aggregate demand contracts regardless of migration assumptions, whereas future needs are driven more by the births of foreigners in Austria than by new arrivals. Foreign nationals consume services in proportion to their demographic weight, with deviations explained by age structure rather than over-utilisation. These results show that the drivers of service demand are sector-specific: migration restrictions could ease housing pressure, but would not address ageing-driven healthcare demand and may accelerate contraction in the education system.