Multi-Class Segmentation of Aortic Branches and Zones in Computed Tomography Angiography: The AortaSeg24 Challenge

📅 2025-02-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing aortic segmentation methods are limited to binary classification, hindering clinical measurement of branch diameters and regional anatomical analysis, and suffer from a lack of open-source multi-class datasets. To address this, we introduce the first open-source multi-class aortic CTA dataset—comprising 100 cases annotated with 23 anatomical structures—and establish the first standardized multi-class segmentation benchmark, enabling a paradigm shift from binary to anatomy-aware fine-grained segmentation. We propose a clinically motivated joint evaluation metric (Dice + Normalized Surface Distance) and develop a nnU-Net–based cascade architecture incorporating a customized loss function, multi-scale augmentation, and surface-aware optimization. Our framework attracted 121 teams in an international challenge, with top-performing models achieving an average Dice score exceeding 0.82. All data, source code, and winning models are publicly released.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Multi-class segmentation of the aorta in computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans is essential for diagnosing and planning complex endovascular treatments for patients with aortic dissections. However, existing methods reduce aortic segmentation to a binary problem, limiting their ability to measure diameters across different branches and zones. Furthermore, no open-source dataset is currently available to support the development of multi-class aortic segmentation methods. To address this gap, we organized the AortaSeg24 MICCAI Challenge, introducing the first dataset of 100 CTA volumes annotated for 23 clinically relevant aortic branches and zones. This dataset was designed to facilitate both model development and validation. The challenge attracted 121 teams worldwide, with participants leveraging state-of-the-art frameworks such as nnU-Net and exploring novel techniques, including cascaded models, data augmentation strategies, and custom loss functions. We evaluated the submitted algorithms using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Normalized Surface Distance (NSD), highlighting the approaches adopted by the top five performing teams. This paper presents the challenge design, dataset details, evaluation metrics, and an in-depth analysis of the top-performing algorithms. The annotated dataset, evaluation code, and implementations of the leading methods are publicly available to support further research. All resources can be accessed at https://aortaseg24.grand-challenge.org.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Multi-class aortic segmentation in CTA scans
Lack of open-source dataset for development
Evaluation of top-performing segmentation algorithms
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Multi-class aortic segmentation dataset
Utilized nnU-Net and cascaded models
Publicly accessible evaluation metrics
M
Muhammad Imran
Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States
J
Jonathan R. Krebs
Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States
Vishal Balaji Sivaraman
Vishal Balaji Sivaraman
University of Florida
Medical ImagingDeep LearningImage RegistrationImage SegmentationImage Super Resolution
T
Teng Zhang
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States
Amarjeet Kumar
Amarjeet Kumar
University of Florida
Deep LearningArtificial Intelligence
Walker Ueland
Walker Ueland
University of Florida
M
Michael J Fassler
Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States
J
Jinlong Huang
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanhai, China
X
Xiao Sun
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanhai, China
L
Lisheng Wang
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanhai, China
P
Pengcheng Shi
Electronic & Information Engineering School, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China
M
Maximilian R. Rokuss
Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
M
M. Baumgartner
Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Y
Yannick Kirchhof
Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Klaus H. Maier-Hein
Klaus H. Maier-Hein
Professor, Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center
Medical Image AnalysisMachine Learning
Fabian Isensee
Fabian Isensee
HIP Applied Computer Vision Lab, Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center
Computer VisionDeep LearningSegmentationMedical Image Computing
S
Shuolin Liu
CANON MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CHINA) CO., LTD, Beijing, China
B
Bing Han
CANON MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CHINA) CO., LTD, Beijing, China
B
Bong Thanh Nguyen
MedAI, Seoul, South Korea; Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
D
Dong-jin Shin
MedAI, Seoul, South Korea; Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
P
Park Ji-Woo
MedAI, Seoul, South Korea; Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
M
Mathew Choi
MedAI, Seoul, South Korea; Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
K
Kwang-Hyun Uhm
MedAI, Seoul, South Korea; Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
Sung-Jea Ko
Sung-Jea Ko
Professor of Electrical Engineering, Korea University
Image ProcessingComputer Vision
Chanwoong Lee
Chanwoong Lee
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Jaehee Chun
Jaehee Chun
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Artificial Intelligence
J
Jin Sung Kim
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
M
Minghui Zhang
Institute of Medical Robotics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Hanxiao Zhang
Hanxiao Zhang
Nanjing University
Xin You
Xin You
Beihang University
Performance Tool、HPC
Yun Gu
Yun Gu
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Medical Image AnalysisComputer-Assisted Intervention
Z
Zhaohong Pan
Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China
X
Xuan Liu
Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China
X
Xiaokun Liang
Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China
M
Markus Tiefenthaler
Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
E
Enrique Almar-Munoz
Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Matthias Schwab
Matthias Schwab
Graduate Student, Medical University of Innsbruck
Applied MathematicsMachine LearningSegmentationInverse Problems
M
Mikhail Kotyushev
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia
R
Rostislav Epifanov
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia
M
Marek Wodzinski
AGH University of Krakow, Krakow, Poland; Institute of Informatics, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Sierre, Switzerland; University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; The Sense Innovation and Research Center, Sion, Switzerland
H
Henning Muller
Institute of Informatics, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Sierre, Switzerland; University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; The Sense Innovation and Research Center, Sion, Switzerland
Abdul Qayyum
Abdul Qayyum
Imperial College London, UK
Machine and Deep LearningBiomedical Signals and ImagingCardiac Digital Twinquantum ML
Moona Mazher
Moona Mazher
University College London, UK
Medical Image AnalysisDeep LearningEEG signal processingMachine LearningBrain signal
S
Steven A. Niederer
National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Z
Zhiwei Wang
Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
K
Kaixiang Yang
Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
J
Jintao Ren
Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
S
S. Korreman
Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Nordre Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 11, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
Yuchong Gao
Yuchong Gao
Shanghaitech University, Pudong, Shanghai, China
Hongye Zeng
Hongye Zeng
Shanghaitech University, Pudong, Shanghai, China
H
Haoyu Zheng
Shanghaitech University, Pudong, Shanghai, China
R
Rui Zheng
Shanghaitech University, Pudong, Shanghai, China
J
Jinghua Yue
Image Processing Center, Beihang University, Beijing, China
F
Fugen Zhou
Image Processing Center, Beihang University, Beijing, China
B
Bo Liu
Image Processing Center, Beihang University, Beijing, China
A
Alexander Cosman
Department of Computer, Information Science, and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States
Muxuan Liang
Muxuan Liang
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Precision MedicineMachine LearningBiostatistics
Chang Zhao
Chang Zhao
University of Florida
Ecosystem ServicesLandscape EcologyGeoAISpatial Data ScienceRemote Sensing
G
Gilbert R. Upchurch
Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States
J
Jun Ma
Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States; Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States
Yuyin Zhou
Yuyin Zhou
Assistant Professor, Computer Science and Engineering, Genomics Institute, UC Santa Cruz
medical image analysismachine learningcomputer visionAI in healthcare
M
Michol A. Cooper
Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States
W
Wei Shao
Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States