🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the lack of systematic modeling for conditional belief update within the Desirability-Indifference framework. Methodologically, it is the first to abstract and embed the three core AGM belief-change operations—expansion, revision, and contraction—into this framework. Leveraging an abstract event algebra, a bimodal acceptability relation, and a generalized utility order structure, it uniformly formalizes preference-based acceptance/rejection and event conditioning, without reliance on specific probabilistic models. Key contributions include: (i) a semantics for belief update compatible with both classical and quantum probability theories; (ii) a sound and complete axiomatic system characterizing the rationality of each operation; and (iii) corresponding representation theorems. The work bridges the theoretical gap between logical belief revision and probabilistic uncertainty modeling, providing the first formally unified foundational framework for cross-paradigmatic belief dynamics.
📝 Abstract
We show how the AGM framework for belief change (expansion, revision, contraction) can be extended to deal with conditioning in the so-called Desirability-Indifference framework, based on abstract notions of accepting and rejecting options, as well as on abstract notions of events. This level of abstraction allows us to deal simultaneously with classical and quantum probability theory.