Linear Risk Sharing on Networks

📅 2025-09-24
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Peer-to-peer insurance and decentralized finance require network-structured risk reallocation mechanisms that ensure fairness, efficiency, and robustness. Method: This paper proposes a Linear Risk Sharing (LRS) framework grounded in nonnegative linear operators, unifying the modeling of stochastic loss redistribution across network participants. It integrates doubly stochastic matrix theory, convex order analysis, and random graph models—including Erdős–Rényi and preferential attachment—to systematically characterize risk diversification patterns on complete, star, ring, and scale-free topologies. Contribution/Results: We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for budget balance, fairness, and diversification guarantees. Moreover, we establish quantitative links between network topology and risk-sharing efficiency—measured via variance reduction and second-order stochastic dominance. The framework provides a verifiable theoretical foundation and structured design principles for fair, robust, and high-efficiency distributed risk-pooling mechanisms.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Over the past decade alternatives to traditional insurance and banking have grown in popularity. The desire to encourage local participation has lead products such as peer-to-peer insurance, reciprocal contracts, and decentralized finance platforms to increasingly rely on network structures to redistribute risk among participants. In this paper, we develop a comprehensive framework for linear risk sharing (LRS), where random losses are reallocated through nonnegative linear operators which can accommodate a wide range of networks. Building on the theory of stochastic and doubly stochastic matrices, we establish conditions under which constraints such as budget balance, fairness, and diversification are guaranteed. The convex order framework allows us to compare different allocations rigorously, highlighting variance reduction and majorization as natural consequences of doubly stochastic mixing. We then extend the analysis to network-based sharing, showing how their topology shapes risk outcomes in complete, star, ring, random, and scale-free graphs. A second layer of randomness, where the sharing matrix itself is random, is introduced via Erdős--Rényi and preferential-attachment networks, connecting risk-sharing properties to degree distributions. Finally, we study convex combinations of identity and network-induced operators, capturing the trade-off between self-retention and diversification. Our results provide design principles for fair and efficient peer-to-peer insurance and network-based risk pooling, combining mathematical soundness with economic interpretability.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Modeling risk redistribution through linear operators on network structures
Establishing conditions for budget balance, fairness and diversification guarantees
Analyzing how network topology shapes risk outcomes in various graph types
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Linear risk sharing uses nonnegative linear operators
Framework ensures budget balance and fairness constraints
Analyzes risk outcomes across various network topologies
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.