🤖 AI Summary
Existing benchmarks predominantly focus on single-turn question answering and lack systematic evaluation of factual accuracy and information efficiency in knowledge-intensive multi-turn, long-form dialogues—particularly in domains such as medicine, finance, and law. To address this gap, we introduce KnowMT-Bench, the first dedicated benchmark for knowledge-intensive multi-turn QA. It features dynamically generated multi-turn dialogue histories and an automated evaluation pipeline integrating human verification with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to quantify how contextual noise degrades model performance. Experimental results demonstrate that multi-turn interaction significantly reduces both factual accuracy and information efficiency; however, RAG effectively mitigates—and in some cases reverses—this degradation, substantially improving answer quality. This work fills a critical void in evaluating multi-turn QA for knowledge-intensive applications and establishes a new paradigm for assessing the reliability of large language models in professional, domain-specific settings.
📝 Abstract
Multi-Turn Long-Form Question Answering (MT-LFQA) is a key application paradigm of Large Language Models (LLMs) in knowledge-intensive domains. However, existing benchmarks are limited to single-turn dialogue, while multi-turn dialogue benchmarks typically assess other orthogonal capabilities rather than knowledge-intensive factuality. To bridge this critical gap, we introduce extbf{KnowMT-Bench}, the extit{first-ever} benchmark designed to systematically evaluate MT-LFQA for LLMs across knowledge-intensive fields, including medicine, finance, and law. To faithfully assess the model's real-world performance, KnowMT-Bench employs a dynamic evaluation setting where models generate their own multi-turn dialogue histories given logically progressive question sequences. The factual capability and information delivery efficiency of the extit{final-turn} answer are then evaluated using a human-validated automated pipeline. Our experiments reveal that multi-turn contexts degrade performance: factual capability declines due to the contextual noise from self-generated histories, while information efficiency drops as models become more verbose with increasing dialogue length. We then investigate mitigation strategies, demonstrating that retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can effectively alleviate and even reverse this factual degradation. These findings underscore the importance of our benchmark in evaluating and enhancing the conversational factual capabilities of LLMs in real-world knowledge-intensive applications. Code is available at href{https://github.com/hardenyu21/KnowMT-Bench}{ extcolor{cyan}{ exttt{KnowMT-Bench}}}.